1926
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1926.10879675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The School Child’s Choice of Companions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

1927
1927
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative analysis of social interactions goes back to the early 1920s [513]. The study of the school child's choice of companions reported by Wellman in 1926 [514] and the Mayo's study of social interactions between factory workers in the 1930s [19] are some examples of pioneering works in social network analysis. The cross-interaction of researchers form diverse disciplines as sociology, applied anthropology, social psychology and statistics has raised over the years a solid scientific discipline with its own textbooks [18,19], and specialized journals as Social Networks published by Elsevier.…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative analysis of social interactions goes back to the early 1920s [513]. The study of the school child's choice of companions reported by Wellman in 1926 [514] and the Mayo's study of social interactions between factory workers in the 1930s [19] are some examples of pioneering works in social network analysis. The cross-interaction of researchers form diverse disciplines as sociology, applied anthropology, social psychology and statistics has raised over the years a solid scientific discipline with its own textbooks [18,19], and specialized journals as Social Networks published by Elsevier.…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among groups with similar demographical attributes, homophilous behavior can be observed (McPherson and Smith-Lovin 1987). The argument of homophilous behavior is derived from the concept of social similarity (McPherson et al 2001;Wellman 1926)-meaning that individuals are acting in favor of other individuals that are similar to themselves (Pearce and Xu 2012). The underlying argument is the individuals' expectation of the similarity of values, interests and norms of individuals with similar demographical characteristics (Ibarra 1992;McPherson et al 2001).…”
Section: Network Embeddedness Effects On Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and social ties (e.g., influence, interaction, companionship, etc.) [104] [105] [106]. Drawing inspiration from these previous works, modern social network analysis emerged as interdisciplinary field with contributions from various areas of study such as sociology, anthropology, and mathematics [107] [108].…”
Section: Development and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%