The scholarly output of economists: A description of publishing patterns

On the Relationship between the Student‐Advisor Match and Early Career Research Productivity for Agricultural and Resource Economics Ph.D.s

“…Finally, as previous studies by Davis, Huston, and Patterson (2001), Collins, Cox, and Stango (2000), and Buchmueller, Dominitz, and Hansen (1999) indicate, an important determinant of a student's future productivity is whether he or she holds a researchoriented job. To determine a student's first postgraduation job our initial source is the self-reported information contained on various Ph.D. programs' websites.…”

An analysis of the determinants in Economics and Business publications by Spanish universities between 1994 and 2004

“…Another interesting study which complements the one by Maske et al (2003) is by Davis et al (2001). These authors analyse the productivity of a cohort of economists during the fifteen years after producing their doctoral thesis.…”

Academic content, research productivity, and tenure

“…These variables are: the number of publications, the number of pages in the article, the number of publications adjusted by the number of authors, the number of pages in the article adjusted by the number of authors, the number of publications in top finance journals, and the number of publications in top journals adjusted by the number of authors. The first section of Table 2 Table 2 show that graduates in 2 Following Davis et al (2001) who indicate that scholarly journals are the most important research outlet, we consider only publications in scholarly journals as the main intellectual contribution at the time of tenure. However, we recognize that in some environments other intellectual contributions such as books and conference presentations, regarded as complementary by Davis et al (2001), could be considered in the tenure process.…”

“…The first section of Table 2 Table 2 show that graduates in 2 Following Davis et al (2001) who indicate that scholarly journals are the most important research outlet, we consider only publications in scholarly journals as the main intellectual contribution at the time of tenure. However, we recognize that in some environments other intellectual contributions such as books and conference presentations, regarded as complementary by Davis et al (2001), could be considered in the tenure process. The second section of Table 2 shows the results for the graduates in Group "A."…”

“…Davis et al (2001) find that, while publishing success depends on the quality of the graduate school attended and the type of the employer, research output begins to decline after tenure. Bess (1998), however, finds no reduction in research productivity after tenure, although Oster and Hamermesh (1998) do indicate that publications in leading journals decline sharply with age.…”