1999
DOI: 10.1007/10704826_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scheduled Transfer (ST) Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the host system's bandwidth is more likely I/O-limited than CPU-limited. So, the key to improving bandwidth is to either improve the host system's ability to move data, decrease the amount of data that needs to be moved, or decrease the number of times that the data needs to be moved across the memory bus [18,19].…”
Section: Breaking the Bottlenecksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the host system's bandwidth is more likely I/O-limited than CPU-limited. So, the key to improving bandwidth is to either improve the host system's ability to move data, decrease the amount of data that needs to be moved, or decrease the number of times that the data needs to be moved across the memory bus [18,19].…”
Section: Breaking the Bottlenecksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than implement a complete TOE, we would like to see an implementation of a TCP header-parsing engine, e.g., a la ST [18]. Briefly, such an engine would use a hash table of established sockets to transfer the payload of incoming packets directly into user memory.…”
Section: Breaking the Bottlenecksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBUDP is an exception, being specifically targeted at photonic networks. Another class of transport protocols, such as Scheduled Transfer (ST) [21] and RDDP [22], has been designed for OS-bypass implementations. At the 10Gbps rates, we expect bottlenecks within end hosts to require OS-bypass implementations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%