1972
DOI: 10.1097/00006842-197211000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Schedule of Recent Experiences

Abstract: One hundred and eighty-seven subjects participated in a study to evaluate the reliability of the weights assigned to individual items in the Schedule of Recent Experiences (SRE). There was a high correlation between this group's responses and the responses originally reported by Holmes and Rahe, in spite of differences in age and education between the respondents. The correlation remained very high when the study was repeated after a 1-year interval. This finding offers support for the usefulness of this instr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Masuda and Holmes (1967) reported alpha coef® cients for a large group of personal and demographic variables, ranging from .82 to .97. Mendels and Weinstein (1972) reported similar reliability ® ndings. Researchers have reported event recall reliability (Casey, Masuda, & Holmes, 1967) and item-weighting reliability (Gerst, Grant, Yager, & Sweetwood, 1978;Mendels & Weinstein, 1972).…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Masuda and Holmes (1967) reported alpha coef® cients for a large group of personal and demographic variables, ranging from .82 to .97. Mendels and Weinstein (1972) reported similar reliability ® ndings. Researchers have reported event recall reliability (Casey, Masuda, & Holmes, 1967) and item-weighting reliability (Gerst, Grant, Yager, & Sweetwood, 1978;Mendels & Weinstein, 1972).…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…life events leading to other life events, and therefore spurious additive weightings may give false high scores (5). Depressed subjects may over-report events "in search for the meaning" and normal subjects may under-report events (5) and lastly their test retest (6) and inter-rater reliability (7) are doubtful.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of recall of life-events remains contentious (Byme & Whyte, 1980) and though the focus of this paper is not on life-events per se, they comprise an important part of the data, and this issue needs to be addressed prior to a discussion of later data analyses. Time since life-event occurrence influences the accuracy of recall, though the magnitude of this is not great (Paykel, 1980) and the problem would seem to lie with the inability to recall trivial, distant events rather than important or recent ones (Mendels & Weinstein, 1972). Thus, while the present life-events data may represent a recalled subset of the total life-event experience the evidence would suggest that this subset represents a very substantial part of the total.…”
Section: Type a Behaviour And Coronary Risksmentioning
confidence: 85%