1987
DOI: 10.1093/screen/28.3.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Scene of Action is DIfferent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, although Deleuze's taxonomy illuminates the complex relationship between cinema and the human experience of time across films featuring some of the most famous female-centred films in cinema history -among them All About Eve (Mankiewicz, 1950), Lola Montès, Cléo de 5 à 7 (Varda, 1962) and Vivre sa vie (Godard, 1962) -it generally disregards questions of gender. Indeed, prior to the release of the English translations of Deleuze's Cinéma volumes, Keith Reader (1987) had already noted 'Deleuze's seeming blindness to questions of gender' (p. 102), and since then, D. N. Rodowick (1997) has similarly observed that Deleuze's film-focused work has 'little to say' on issues of sexual difference (p. xiii), while Elizabeth Grosz (2008) cautions that 'Deleuze is no feminist' (p. 216). 2 This absence is particularly surprising since Deleuze and Félix Guattari argue the following in Mille plateaux:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, although Deleuze's taxonomy illuminates the complex relationship between cinema and the human experience of time across films featuring some of the most famous female-centred films in cinema history -among them All About Eve (Mankiewicz, 1950), Lola Montès, Cléo de 5 à 7 (Varda, 1962) and Vivre sa vie (Godard, 1962) -it generally disregards questions of gender. Indeed, prior to the release of the English translations of Deleuze's Cinéma volumes, Keith Reader (1987) had already noted 'Deleuze's seeming blindness to questions of gender' (p. 102), and since then, D. N. Rodowick (1997) has similarly observed that Deleuze's film-focused work has 'little to say' on issues of sexual difference (p. xiii), while Elizabeth Grosz (2008) cautions that 'Deleuze is no feminist' (p. 216). 2 This absence is particularly surprising since Deleuze and Félix Guattari argue the following in Mille plateaux:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%