1987
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(87)90436-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The scattering of alpha particles from 12C and the stellar reaction rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
130
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results for the E1 part of the cross section essentially confirmed their earlier extrapolated value S E1 (E 0 )ϭ(79Ϯ21) keV b, and for the E2 part, established the upper limit S E2 (E 0 )Ͻ 140 keV b. Hale (1996) recently reported an R-matrix analysis of the E1 cross section alone that also used the elasticscattering angular-distribution data of Plaga et al (1987) rather than the P wave scattering phase shift. This analysis indicated that a rather low value of S E1 (E 0 ), 20 keV b, was consistent with all the measured data, including those of the ␤-delayed ␣ spectrum.…”
Section: Other Analyses and Recommended Valuessupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their results for the E1 part of the cross section essentially confirmed their earlier extrapolated value S E1 (E 0 )ϭ(79Ϯ21) keV b, and for the E2 part, established the upper limit S E2 (E 0 )Ͻ 140 keV b. Hale (1996) recently reported an R-matrix analysis of the E1 cross section alone that also used the elasticscattering angular-distribution data of Plaga et al (1987) rather than the P wave scattering phase shift. This analysis indicated that a rather low value of S E1 (E 0 ), 20 keV b, was consistent with all the measured data, including those of the ␤-delayed ␣ spectrum.…”
Section: Other Analyses and Recommended Valuessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The importance of the subthreshold 1 Ϫ state at EϭϪ45 keV (E x ϭ7.11685 MeV) in fitting and extrapolating the E1 cross section was first demonstrated by Dyer and Barnes (1974). Most subsequent analyses have fit S factors extracted from the measurements along with the P wave phase shift obtained from ␣ϩ 12 C elastic scattering measurements (Plaga et al, 1987), using either R-matrix or K-matrix theory. More recently, several groups have acted on the longstanding suggestion of Barker (1971) to measure the ␤-delayed ␣ spectrum from the decay of 16 N with the hope of better determining the contribution of the subthreshold state, which is evident in the spectrum as a secondary maximum at low energies.…”
Section: E1 Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good description of the excitation functions below E c.m. = 5 MeV [10,12] is also obtained (figure 2). The potential in the present study seems to be comparable to the folding potential with the M3Y interaction [7,11,13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The capture cross section is given as σ αγ ∝ ⟨ϕ f |ẽM E λ |ϕ i ⟩ 2 , where M E λ is the electric operator of Eλ transition. To generate the scattering state ϕ i , I use the potential describing elastic scattering [3,6,7]. The α+ 12 C cluster structure in 16 O is semi-classically defined by the evaluation of refractive scattering [8,9].…”
Section: Potential Model and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%