2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2007.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the private company discount: An empirical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They explain their results by proposing that private ownership leads to superior bargaining power, suggesting that the takeovers of privately held targets create superior total value, as acquirer gains do not appear to occur at the expense of private target gains. It needs to be mentioned that their study does not address the possibility that these relatively higher multiples are due to differences in accounting standards applicable to companies not listed on a major stock exchange (DiGabriele, 2007). Similarly, Lys and Yehuda (2011) report that the premium over the standalone value paid for privately held targets is generally higher, but is more than offset by higher synergies.…”
Section: Are Privately Held Enterprises Cheaper?mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They explain their results by proposing that private ownership leads to superior bargaining power, suggesting that the takeovers of privately held targets create superior total value, as acquirer gains do not appear to occur at the expense of private target gains. It needs to be mentioned that their study does not address the possibility that these relatively higher multiples are due to differences in accounting standards applicable to companies not listed on a major stock exchange (DiGabriele, 2007). Similarly, Lys and Yehuda (2011) report that the premium over the standalone value paid for privately held targets is generally higher, but is more than offset by higher synergies.…”
Section: Are Privately Held Enterprises Cheaper?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was the last significant change to US securities law. Consequently, the due diligence process has become more rigorous and is now being consummated more slowly (DiGabriele, 2007). However, to date, no studies regarding the effect of SOX on value creation and acquisition premiums in takeover transactions in general have been published.…”
Section: Distribution Of the Created Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the economic efficiency perspective, the cost can bring more benefits to larger firms. DiGabriele (2008) finds that since implementation of SOX, nonpublic firms have suffered a significant increase in loss of firm value. Menon and Williams (1994) show that firms with a larger board can benefit more from setting up an audit committee.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DiGabriele () finds evidence in the post‐SOX era that the private company discount has increased. However, the paper does not explore variation in the level of pre‐acquisition SOX compliance as a predictor of deal proceeds in either the pre‐ or post‐SOX period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%