The SAPEVO-M-NC Method

Abstract

This article aims to present with more details, the multicriteria decision aid SAPEVO-M-NC (Simple Aggregation of Preferences Expressed by Ordinal Vectors - Non-Compensatory - Multi Decision Makers). It is a new version of the SAPEVO-M method, of an ordinal, non-compensatory nature and with the possibility of acting by multiple decision makers. As a result, the method provides information on the partial weights, indicating the relative importance of the criteria for each of the decision makers, the relative dominance values and two evaluations on the performance of the alternatives: a partial one, which considers the absolute dominance indices, being used to assess existing dominance relationships; and a global one, which provides the performance rates of the alternatives, making it possible to order them as well as to carry out a sensitivity analysis on the observed performances, reflecting in greater transparency in the decision-making process.

Evaluation of Smart Sensors for Subway Electric Motor Escalators through AHP-Gaussian Method

“…The AHP-Gaussian model, as its main differential, manages to weigh weights between the criteria, saving the decision maker's cognitive effort. The use of a decision support model for decision making in situations that will impact costs and influence the life of society is highly recommended [92,93]. In this application, the Smart sensor ABB Ability Sensors were selected based on the described criteria and the performance of the alternatives.…”

Variação Do Problema Da Dieta: Aplicação Da Programação Linear Para Minimizar a Pegada De Carbono Das Refeições Fornecidas Por Uma Empresa Brasileira Aos Seus Funcionários

“…Modelos matemáticos para tomada de decisão em problemas complexos têm sido usados em vários problemas recentes, como visto em Costa et al (2021) e Maêda et al (2022).…”

Interactive Internet Framework Proposal of WASPAS Method: A Computational Contribution for Decision-Making Analysis

“…In MCDA, criteria weights reflect the importance or priority assigned to each criterion in the decision-making process. The weights are typically determined based on the decision-maker's preferences, and they influence how the alternatives are evaluated and compared [20,21]. Strategic weight manipulation refers to a strategy employed in MCDA where decision-makers strategically manipulate the weights assigned to criteria to influence the overall decision outcome or ranking of alternatives.…”