1972
DOI: 10.3758/bf03212695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sander illusion as a function of relative space and component lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…monitor. Displays consisted of black-on-white drawings of a Sander parallelogram with the diagonals omitted; the latter results in a greater magnitude of illusion compared with the standard figure (Cooper et al, 1972; refer to Figure 1). The sides and tops of the figure were 2.25° and 6.36°, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…monitor. Displays consisted of black-on-white drawings of a Sander parallelogram with the diagonals omitted; the latter results in a greater magnitude of illusion compared with the standard figure (Cooper et al, 1972; refer to Figure 1). The sides and tops of the figure were 2.25° and 6.36°, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected the Sander parallelogram illusion for several reasons. First, the magnitude of illusion is relatively large (often 20-25%), is comparable to the magnitude of the Mueller-Lyer illusion (25-30%), and increases when the diagonals are removed (Cooper, Runyon, Tatz, & Heimer, 1972;Coren & Girgus, 1978). Second, the Sander illusion permitted a comparison of performance on the different tasks without modification of the parallelogram; that is, the informational context was the same across tasks.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%