2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21186088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sample Size Matters: To What Extent the Participant Reduction Affects the Outcomes of a Neuroscientific Research. A Case-Study in Neuromarketing Field

Abstract: The sample size is a crucial concern in scientific research and even more in behavioural neurosciences, where besides the best practice it is not always possible to reach large experimental samples. In this study we investigated how the outcomes of research change in response to sample size reduction. Three indices computed during a task involving the observations of four videos were considered in the analysis, two related to the brain electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and one to autonomic physiological m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size was determined based on the observed effect and n from previously published EEG studies on brain activity in response to environmental exposure ( Grassini et al, 2019 ). The number of participants recruited for our study is also in line with recent investigations on the relationship between participants number and EEG data reliability for relatively long tasks during EEG recording ( Vozzi et al, 2021 ). Data from two participants were excluded from the analysis of cognitive task (digit-span backward scores), and two were excluded from the analysis of the EDA data due to technical issues in data collection.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The sample size was determined based on the observed effect and n from previously published EEG studies on brain activity in response to environmental exposure ( Grassini et al, 2019 ). The number of participants recruited for our study is also in line with recent investigations on the relationship between participants number and EEG data reliability for relatively long tasks during EEG recording ( Vozzi et al, 2021 ). Data from two participants were excluded from the analysis of cognitive task (digit-span backward scores), and two were excluded from the analysis of the EDA data due to technical issues in data collection.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, several issues need to be considered further. First, the sample size was relatively small in this study, although the current sample size met the minimum requirement on the correlational analyses of the neurophysiological indexes as reported previously ( Vozzi et al, 2021 ), future work with enlarging the samples should been done to verify the current findings. Second, the current resting-state EEG analysis only focused on the eyes closed EEG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, several issues need to be further addressed. First, the sample size was relatively small in this study, although the current sample size met the minimum requirement on the correlational analyses of the neurophysiological indexes as reported previously ( Vozzi et al, 2021 ). Future work expanding sample size are warranted to verify the current findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%