1966
DOI: 10.1029/jz071i014p03405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Salmon Seismic Experiment

Abstract: The Salmon nuclear detonation of October 22, 1964, had a nuclear yield of 5.3±0.5 kt. The teleseismic magnitude was 4.35. P waves observed out to 2500 km show asymmetries in the propagation, with high amplitudes (mμ/sec), faster apparent velocities, and higher signal frequencies to the north and northeast than to the west. At teleseismic distances, many of the signals were very weak and could be identified with Salmon only because the time of detonation and expected arrival time were known. If a cavity were bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary goal of this series of tests was to evaluate the effect of source decoupling. Decoupling has a profound effect on the estimates of yield from seismic waves [Werth and Randolph, 1966;Herbst et al, 1961;Patterson, 1966] and is therefore important in some evasion scenarios. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the Salmon cavity as determined from direct observations from boreholes and indirect observations using geophysical means [Rawson et al, 1966].…”
Section: Sterling and Its Strong Motion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary goal of this series of tests was to evaluate the effect of source decoupling. Decoupling has a profound effect on the estimates of yield from seismic waves [Werth and Randolph, 1966;Herbst et al, 1961;Patterson, 1966] and is therefore important in some evasion scenarios. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the Salmon cavity as determined from direct observations from boreholes and indirect observations using geophysical means [Rawson et al, 1966].…”
Section: Sterling and Its Strong Motion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functions C mn (r, p, q) and S mn (r, p, q) of three arguments are the real and imaginary parts of the known integrals % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gnome 3.1 [15] 360 [16] 2200 [11] 4080 [11] 3120 [17] 2740 [11] 0.17 [11] 1040 895 82 4.4 7.0 6.0 Salmon 5.3 [18] 828 [18] 2240 [15] 4670 [19] 3700 [18,19] 3770 [14] 0.06 [14] 700 719 57 14.4 3. 2 3.3 which are expressed explicitly as C 00 (r, p, q) = M/R, S 00 (r, p, q) = N/R,…”
Section: Rayleigh Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is beyond the 8-Mt'a shear strength assumed for the salt, so local failure must have occurred and the stress distribution was not given by Eqs. (10) and (11), which are for an elastic medium.…”
Section: '(F)mentioning
confidence: 99%