2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.13011
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SAGEX Review on Scattering Amplitudes

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work is an outgrowth and continuation of the study of chaos in scattering amplitudes [23][24][25]. More generally, the study of excited string scattering may connect with the large literature on modern scattering amplitudes in quantum field theory and string theory [26], such as scattering of higher spin particles [27,28].…”
Section: Jhep09(2022)211mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This work is an outgrowth and continuation of the study of chaos in scattering amplitudes [23][24][25]. More generally, the study of excited string scattering may connect with the large literature on modern scattering amplitudes in quantum field theory and string theory [26], such as scattering of higher spin particles [27,28].…”
Section: Jhep09(2022)211mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly, the post-Minkowskian (PM) approximation is a weak-field expansion, but places no restriction on the magnitude of velocities. Next to entirely classical approaches to the PM approximation [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], recent progress is pioneered by methods starting out from (quantum) scattering amplitudes [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. In addition, manifestly classical methods that make use of quantumfield-theory techniques show great promise for advancing the PM approximation, namely effective field theory [40][41][42][43][44][45] and worldline quantum field theory [46,47] approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these developments involve so-called on-shell methods (see e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6] for reviews on the always increasing number of techniques). On the other hand, off-shell methods are very scarce (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%