Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety of JAK-1 inhibitors

Abstract: As efficacy and safety data emerge, differences between JAK inhibitor subclasses are appearing. JAK1 selective drugs, upadacitinib and filgotinib, have broadly come with the same overarching safety recommendations as other immunosuppressive drugs for RA: caution is needed regarding infection risk; monitoring for laboratory abnormalities, including lipids and muscle enzymes, is indicated. A distinguishing feature of JAK inhibitors is a risk for zoster reactivation. Numerically, overall rates of serious infectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the other groups in Study 2, baseline platelet counts were lower in the 90‐mg group, which may have contributed to a higher proportion of these patients experiencing transient thrombocytopenia. Several reviews on the overall safety of JAK inhibitors have been published recently 54–56 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the other groups in Study 2, baseline platelet counts were lower in the 90‐mg group, which may have contributed to a higher proportion of these patients experiencing transient thrombocytopenia. Several reviews on the overall safety of JAK inhibitors have been published recently 54–56 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the lack of direct comparison in head-to-head studies between JAK inhibitors, we are limited in drawing conclusions regarding the relative risk of HZ with UPA as compared with other JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib). 35 Differences in study design, length of follow-up, inclusion and exclusion criteria, study sites and data analysis limit the ability to compare data across clinical trials. With those limitations in mind, the incidence rates described within the UPA programme are similar to those described in the RA programmes for tofacitinib and baricitinib, with the highest rates in all three programmes observed in the Asian region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 However, systemic JAK1 inhibitor treatment is likely to cause significant immunosuppression and an increased risk of infection as well as herpes zoster reactivation. 30 Local delivery of a selective JAK1 inhibitor to the lungs by inhalation may minimize the potential for systemic immunosuppression while providing maximal therapeutic effect in the inflamed lung tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%