2021
DOI: 10.1177/20420986211027096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Objective(s): The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from their inception until May 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs evaluating the risk of adverse events (AEs) for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparative treatments for acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included. R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…40 In contrast, a recently published meta-analysis showed that overall adverse events with C/T treatment were similar to the control group (51.3% vs. 49.9% adverse events, respectively), but with higher rates than in our study. 41 However, due to the retrospective nature of our study, non-serious adverse events may have been underrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…40 In contrast, a recently published meta-analysis showed that overall adverse events with C/T treatment were similar to the control group (51.3% vs. 49.9% adverse events, respectively), but with higher rates than in our study. 41 However, due to the retrospective nature of our study, non-serious adverse events may have been underrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%