2022
DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2065358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety and feasibility of simultaneous robotic repair of an inguinal hernia during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our present study, the extra time needed for R-TAPP was 21 and 23 min, which is not very different from the time of 26 min in a prior metaanalysis. 6 Besides, our findings corroborate the meta-analysis that reported no drawbacks of concurrent R-TAPP in terms of a higher risk of bleeding or postoperative complications. 6 Our report provides one piece of evidence that simultaneous RARP and R-TAPP can be performed safely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our present study, the extra time needed for R-TAPP was 21 and 23 min, which is not very different from the time of 26 min in a prior metaanalysis. 6 Besides, our findings corroborate the meta-analysis that reported no drawbacks of concurrent R-TAPP in terms of a higher risk of bleeding or postoperative complications. 6 Our report provides one piece of evidence that simultaneous RARP and R-TAPP can be performed safely.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6 Besides, our findings corroborate the meta-analysis that reported no drawbacks of concurrent R-TAPP in terms of a higher risk of bleeding or postoperative complications. 6 Our report provides one piece of evidence that simultaneous RARP and R-TAPP can be performed safely. However, we acknowledge that more controlled prospective studies are needed to verify the safety and efficacy of this procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation