2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02735-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Safety and Efficacy of Spreader Grafts and Autospreaders in Rhinoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the above challenges, some notable comparison studies are worthy of highlighting. Buba et al 3 performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing the functional effects of auto‐spreader flaps and spreader grafts. The two techniques are amenable to quality comparisons given the significant overlap of indications, that is, static narrowing of the internal nasal valve.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the above challenges, some notable comparison studies are worthy of highlighting. Buba et al 3 performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis comparing the functional effects of auto‐spreader flaps and spreader grafts. The two techniques are amenable to quality comparisons given the significant overlap of indications, that is, static narrowing of the internal nasal valve.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example was a systematic review from 2022 looking at the safety and efficacy of autospreaders during rhinoplasty which found a total of 1129 studies, less than 2% of which included any quantifiable data. 7 The goal of this article to is to discuss the role of evidence-based medicine in the setting of rhinoplasty. In particular, this text aims to highlight the standardized aspects of rhinoplasty workup and evaluation as well as outcomes data used to measure functional or aesthetic success after surgery with the associated literature to support these methods.…”
Section: (Figure 2-levels Of Evidence Pyramid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all technological, anatomical and surgical advancements, achieving a straight nose may not be possible in a significant group of patients. Several techniques, such as double or asymmetric osteotomies, spreader grafts, cartilage scoring, and several onlay graft techniques, have been described in the literature (1)(2)(3)(4). Since a significant number of patients still undergo revision surgeries for crooked nose, we believe that this problem has not yet been fully resolved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%