2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The safety and efficacy of 2% vitamin C solution spray for relief of mucosal irritation caused by Lugol chromoendoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Washing the esophageal mucosa of patients undergoing Lugol chromoendoscopy (10 mL 2% Lugol iodine solution) with a different solution, and evaluating patients' descriptions of their clinical symptoms after 5 and 35 minutes of ending the examinations, they compared the improving symptoms in 3 distinct groups of 80 patients each, using in the normal saline (NS) group an NS solution (20 mL), in the STS group a 5% STS, and, finally, in the VCS group, a 2% VCS. 23 With the reduction of acute and late adverse symptom severity scores as primary endpoints and the discoloration effect of esophageal brown iodine-stained mucosa as a secondary endpoint, they found no difference between the STS and VCS groups regarding the reduction of both acute and late adverse symptom scores except when they were determined against NS, where both were superior. 23 Interestingly, the authors also found that VCS better alleviated acute acid regurgitation and late retrosternal discomfort or pain when compared with STS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Washing the esophageal mucosa of patients undergoing Lugol chromoendoscopy (10 mL 2% Lugol iodine solution) with a different solution, and evaluating patients' descriptions of their clinical symptoms after 5 and 35 minutes of ending the examinations, they compared the improving symptoms in 3 distinct groups of 80 patients each, using in the normal saline (NS) group an NS solution (20 mL), in the STS group a 5% STS, and, finally, in the VCS group, a 2% VCS. 23 With the reduction of acute and late adverse symptom severity scores as primary endpoints and the discoloration effect of esophageal brown iodine-stained mucosa as a secondary endpoint, they found no difference between the STS and VCS groups regarding the reduction of both acute and late adverse symptom scores except when they were determined against NS, where both were superior. 23 Interestingly, the authors also found that VCS better alleviated acute acid regurgitation and late retrosternal discomfort or pain when compared with STS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…23 With the reduction of acute and late adverse symptom severity scores as primary endpoints and the discoloration effect of esophageal brown iodine-stained mucosa as a secondary endpoint, they found no difference between the STS and VCS groups regarding the reduction of both acute and late adverse symptom scores except when they were determined against NS, where both were superior. 23 Interestingly, the authors also found that VCS better alleviated acute acid regurgitation and late retrosternal discomfort or pain when compared with STS. VCS and STS quickly discolored the iodine-stained mucosa in a similar way, performing better than NS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations