2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Stm1p facilitates ribosome preservation during quiescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3b). As expected, awr5 expression resulted in a decrease of the levels of the TOR-activated STM1 and NSR1 genes, which are involved in yeast growth2728. In contrast, the levels of the TOR-repressed GAP1 and MEP2 , which control nitrogen catabolite repression29, increased in response to awr5 expression.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…3b). As expected, awr5 expression resulted in a decrease of the levels of the TOR-activated STM1 and NSR1 genes, which are involved in yeast growth2728. In contrast, the levels of the TOR-repressed GAP1 and MEP2 , which control nitrogen catabolite repression29, increased in response to awr5 expression.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…While it is coincidental that the only intact copies of PEP3 and STM1 in the overexpression library were isolated on the same contig—pGP564-YGM18p06—assessment of growth rate and lag phase duration was a helpful step in distinguishing their individual contributions to acetic acid “resistance.” Our finding that STM1 overexpression both increased growth rate and reduced lag phase duration in acetic acid-stressed cells is consistent with previous work that showed a role for STM1 in protecting a subset of ribosomes from degradation during autophagy (Van Dyke et al 2006, 2013). We speculate that such cells are more likely to begin growth sooner and to grow faster once they have recovered from the initial acetic acid shock than cells whose ribosomes have been largely degraded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Because STM1 was also on the pGPM18p06 contig—but not on others in the library—and had previously been implicated in protecting ribosomes from nutritional starvation-induced degradation (Van Dyke et al 2006, 2013), we cloned STM1 into pGP564 and constructed S288c leu2 Δ/pGP564- STM1 to evaluate its individual contribution to overcoming acetic acid-induced stress. In the absence of acetic acid, the lag phase of S288c leu2 Δ / pGP564- STM1 was about 70 % longer than that of the empty vector control strain and its growth rate was about 12 % slower.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction with both subunits likely accounts for their ability to promote subunit association (Correia et al, 2004), possibly to sequester ribosomes during stress to protect them from degradation (e.g. van Dyke et al, 2013). Stm1 was also suggested to inhibit translation (Balagopal and Parker, 2011), which would be consistent with the occlusion of the mRNA-binding channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%