2013
DOI: 10.4161/cbt.26340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The S492R EGFR ectodomain mutation is never detected in KRAS wild-type colorectal carcinoma before exposure to EGFR monoclonal antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(34 reference statements)
8
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, similar to our results, Misale and colleagues (15) were unable to detect the LIM 1215 cetuximab-resistant KRAS G12R mutation in the LIM 1215 parental cells implying that this mutation was acquired during treatment. Moreover, the EGFR S492 gene mutation that was demonstrated to be responsible for the acquisition of cetuximab resistance was not found in metastatic colorectal cancer patients before anti-EGFR treatment (33,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, similar to our results, Misale and colleagues (15) were unable to detect the LIM 1215 cetuximab-resistant KRAS G12R mutation in the LIM 1215 parental cells implying that this mutation was acquired during treatment. Moreover, the EGFR S492 gene mutation that was demonstrated to be responsible for the acquisition of cetuximab resistance was not found in metastatic colorectal cancer patients before anti-EGFR treatment (33,44).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent reports even suggested that the recurrent S492R mutation is acquired through exposure to EGFR monoclonal antibodies rather than being a primary event in carcinogenesis [79,80]. An increase in EGFR gene copy number, mainly due to polysomy of chromosome 7, has also been reported.…”
Section: Genetic Alterations In the Pi3k/akt Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The S492R allele has never been detected to date in untreated colorectal cancer ( 86 ) and is apparently found only in colorectal cancer samples from patients who have been previously exposed to cetuximab. This is consistent with the hypothesis that this allele evolves as cells strive to evade the EGFR blockade imposed by the monoclonal antibody cetuximab, and accordingly remain sensitive to panitumumab, which binds to a different EGFR epitope located on the extracellular domain of EGFR.…”
Section: The Primary = Secondary Rule Has Exceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%