2021
DOI: 10.1017/s1352325221000045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Rule of Law and the Limits of Anarchy

Abstract: Anarchy is often contrasted with law, order, or security. But anarchist societies, by which I mean societies that lack a monopoly of coercive force, need not be lawless. They can develop sophisticated legal systems that regulate the behavior of their members and protect their rights. International law, market anarchism, and other models of anarchism such as the one proposed by Chandran Kukathas already exhibit or could plausibly exhibit complex legal rules and institutions. I will show that insofar as these mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anarchists argue that the current financial system is dominated by a small elite who control and exploit most of people for their own gain. Anarchists propose a decentralized, nonhierarchical financial system that is based on mutual aid, cooperation and voluntary associations (Pavel, 2021). They advocate for the creation of alternative currencies and financial networks that are not controlled by the state or private banks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anarchists argue that the current financial system is dominated by a small elite who control and exploit most of people for their own gain. Anarchists propose a decentralized, nonhierarchical financial system that is based on mutual aid, cooperation and voluntary associations (Pavel, 2021). They advocate for the creation of alternative currencies and financial networks that are not controlled by the state or private banks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I understand anarchy in a narrow sense to mean the absence of a monopoly on the use of force in a political community (Pavel 2021). Other prevalent understandings focus on disorder or the absence of de facto hierarchies, see Donnelly 2015. you, the threatened subject: a 'subject emergency'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 For an example, seeWaldron 2011. 25 For this insight, seeHertogen 2018Hertogen , 1135 SeePavel (2021) for the argument that states can only be either, not both.27For this influential concept, see Simma 1994a. 28Friedman 1964.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%