2020
DOI: 10.5565/publmat6422012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ruelle operator for symmetric $\beta$-shifts

Abstract: Consider m ∈ N and β ∈ (1, m + 1]. Assume that a ∈ R can be represented in base β using a development in series a = ∞ n=1 x(n)β −n , where the sequence x = (x(n)) n∈N takes values in the alphabet Am := {0, . . . , m}. The above expression is called the β-expansion of a and it is not necessarily unique. We are interested in sequences x = (x(n)) n∈N ∈ A N m which are associated to all possible values a which have a unique expansion. We denote the set of such x (with some more technical restrictions) by X m,β ⊂ A… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which will be a necessary result in the proof of Proposition 2 below. By compactness of the set B(A, I), it is guaranteed existence of ϕ-maximizing measures associated to a potential ϕ ∈ H α (B(A, I)) as accumulation points in the weak* topology of the family of equilibrium states (µ tϕ ) t>1 , which are known as ground-states (see for instance [BLL13], [CGU11] and [LV20]). The above, is the main tool that we will use in the proof of Proposition 2.…”
Section: A1∈s(x1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which will be a necessary result in the proof of Proposition 2 below. By compactness of the set B(A, I), it is guaranteed existence of ϕ-maximizing measures associated to a potential ϕ ∈ H α (B(A, I)) as accumulation points in the weak* topology of the family of equilibrium states (µ tϕ ) t>1 , which are known as ground-states (see for instance [BLL13], [CGU11] and [LV20]). The above, is the main tool that we will use in the proof of Proposition 2.…”
Section: A1∈s(x1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…)) , which implies, using (18), that µ ′ ∞ = lim n∈N µ φ ′ tn is a ϕ ′ -maximizing measure (see for instance [BLL13] and [LV20]). Thus, for any µ…”
Section: A1∈s(x1)mentioning
confidence: 99%