2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16367-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The route to transcription initiation determines the mode of transcriptional bursting in E. coli

Abstract: Transcription is fundamentally noisy, leading to significant heterogeneity across bacterial populations. Noise is often attributed to burstiness, but the underlying mechanisms and their dependence on the mode of promotor regulation remain unclear. Here, we measure E. coli single cell mRNA levels for two stress responses that depend on bacterial sigma factors with different mode of transcription initiation (σ 70 and σ 54). By fitting a stochastic model to the observed mRNA distributions, we show that the transi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(171 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…shown 37,38 that it may arise from an extra number of gene states. However our results suggest that delay due to elongation (when the variability in elongation times is small) is another important source contributing to the zero-inflated distributions evident in RNA-seq data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shown 37,38 that it may arise from an extra number of gene states. However our results suggest that delay due to elongation (when the variability in elongation times is small) is another important source contributing to the zero-inflated distributions evident in RNA-seq data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the authors of [ 67 ] do not address noise, they note enormous differences in mean expression levels when an identical construct is integrated at different genomic loci. The authors of [ 68 ] attribute noise and burstiness in their single-molecule mRNA data to the influence of different sigma factors, which is a reasonable conclusion from their data. Could the difference also be due to the different chromosomal locations of the two operons?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This phenomenon is commonly seen in single-cell RNA-seq data, and it is usually attributed to the expression drop-off caused by technical noises or sequencing sensitivity [28]. It has also been shown [29, 30] that it may arise from an extra number of gene states. However our results suggest that delay due to elongation (when the variability in elongation times is small) is another important source contributing to the zero-inflated distributions evident in RNA-seq data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%