2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00434-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The roughness of the supranasal region — a morphological sex trait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the sprouting pattern is a junction inside a single bone and can not be explained from a functional point of view. Schiwy‐Bochat (2001) reported that there is a sprouting‐only area in the supranasal region. We can produce a sprouting‐only pattern with our model (data not shown), and it would be intriguing to predict the change in gene expression by comparing the model parameters and actual patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sprouting pattern is a junction inside a single bone and can not be explained from a functional point of view. Schiwy‐Bochat (2001) reported that there is a sprouting‐only area in the supranasal region. We can produce a sprouting‐only pattern with our model (data not shown), and it would be intriguing to predict the change in gene expression by comparing the model parameters and actual patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However to ensure that the AM information was correct, sex was determined, when possible, from each of the skeletons. As it was assumed that there would only be men among the skeletons, the sex determination was basically done by looking for female traits on the pelvic bones and the skull (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The absence of a clearly female pelvis or skull was taken as satisfactorily evidence of the individual being male.…”
Section: Anthropologic Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been proposed to classify and ⁄ or quantify the shape of human cranial interosseous sutures (Hauser et al 1991), and to use this information to infer sex and age at death of osteoarcheological specimens Mann et al 1987;Meindl et al 1990;Hershkovitz et al 1997;Schiwy-Bochat, 2001;Lynnerup & Jacobsen, 2003;Skrzat & Walocha, 2003;Sahni et al 2005;Wu et al 2007;Wittwer-Backofen et al 2008). Classification systems typically define different degrees of 'corrugatedness' of the suture line, while quantitative methods rely on fractal analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1990; Hershkovitz et al. 1997; Schiwy‐Bochat, 2001; Lynnerup & Jacobsen, 2003; Skrzat & Walocha, 2003; Sahni et al. 2005; Wu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%