1992
DOI: 10.1029/92je01166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rotation period, direction of the North Pole, and geodetic control network of Venus

Abstract: Before the Magellan mission, the best estimates of the rotation rate and pole direction of Venus were derived from Earth‐based radar measurements. A new determination of these rotational parameters has now been made from an analysis of Magellan radar images. Control points were selected from the north polar region and measured on full‐resolution radar strips. The measurements were entered into a least squares adjustment to solve for the pole direction and rotation rate of Venus, as well as the coordinates of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the observed rotation state of Venus corresponds to a stable retrograde rotation 11,19,21 , the only possibilities for this observed ®nal state are e 08 and q obs n 2 q s , or e 1808 and q obs q s 2 n. In both cases, q s n jq obs j, and we can determine all four ®nal states for Venus (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Assuming that the observed rotation state of Venus corresponds to a stable retrograde rotation 11,19,21 , the only possibilities for this observed ®nal state are e 08 and q obs n 2 q s , or e 1808 and q obs q s 2 n. In both cases, q s n jq obs j, and we can determine all four ®nal states for Venus (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, the planet Mercury is also in Cassini state 1, despite being in the 3:2 spin-orbit resonance (Peale, 1969(Peale, , 1974; while Venus is near Cassini state 3, although it is in no spin-orbit resonance at all (Shapiro et al, 1979;Slade et al, 1990;Davies et al, 1992).…”
Section: Obliquitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This period is close to the 243.16-day period for the synodic resonance with the orbital motion of the Earth, in which Venus would show exactly the same face to the Earth at each inferior conjunction and would rotate exactly five times as seen from the Sun between consecutive inferior conjunctions, suggesting that Venus might occupy that resonance (Gold and Soter, 1969;Goldreich and Peale, 1966a,b). Further observations with the Goldstone, Arecibo, and Haystack radar systems yielded an improved period of 243.026 AE 0.006 days (Carpenter, 1966(Carpenter, , 1970Dyce et al, 1967;Shapiro et al, 1990), and the analyses of Magellan data have led to an averaged rotation period of 243.0185 AE 0.0001 days based on radar images (Davies et al, 1992) and of 243.0200 AE 0.0006 days based on X-band radio-tracking data (Konopliv et al, 1993(Konopliv et al, , 1999, all three very close to but not exactly equal to the resonance period of 243.16 days. The analyses of Magellan radar data show that the current obliquity of Venus is about 2.6 (or 177.4 ) (Davies et al, 1992;Yoder, 1995).…”
Section: Current Rotation Statementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, with planetary perturbations included, the final states are no longer steady states. The current obliquity of Venus is 2.6 ( Davies et al, 1992;Yoder, 1995). Planetary-induced changes in the eccentricity of the orbit of Venus can also lead to long periodic changes in the rotation rate.…”
Section: Long-term Spin Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 96%