2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.01.03.474768
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The rosy future paradox: Positive future thinking without task relevance enhances negative biases and anxiety for aversive events

Abstract: Expectations have an important role in guiding behavior and the interpretation of novel information, but can contain negative biases such as is the case in anxiety disorders. Positive future thinking may provide an accessible way to attenuate these negatively biases. However, much is still unclear about the optimal form of such positive interventions, and it is unknown if the effects go beyond subjective experience. Here, we used a positive future thinking intervention to adapt the way a stressful event is exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also unclear whether it is important that the imagery is related to the behavioral experiment or whether any form of positive mental imagery is sufficient. Recent findings suggest that a positive future thinking intervention can mitigate negative effects of a stressful event (Landkroon, van Dis et al, 2021;Montijn, Gerritsen, van Son, & Engelhard, 2022), but only if the intervention is related to the event (Montijn et al, 2022). Future imagery rescripting research with a more stringent control group is needed that also examines long-term efficacy (i.e., symptom reduction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also unclear whether it is important that the imagery is related to the behavioral experiment or whether any form of positive mental imagery is sufficient. Recent findings suggest that a positive future thinking intervention can mitigate negative effects of a stressful event (Landkroon, van Dis et al, 2021;Montijn, Gerritsen, van Son, & Engelhard, 2022), but only if the intervention is related to the event (Montijn et al, 2022). Future imagery rescripting research with a more stringent control group is needed that also examines long-term efficacy (i.e., symptom reduction).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%