2021
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The root cause analysis on failed patient‐specific measurements of pencil beam scanning protons using a 2D detection array with finite size ionization chambers

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, a distance to agreement (DTA) in the depth direction was considered to account for any uncertainties associated with depth positioning. Planar 2D gamma analyses were carried out using criteria of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm to evaluate the expected agreement range, however, the 3%/ 3 mm criterion is widely adopted clinically for PBS proton therapy [35,[39][40][41]. A dose threshold of 10% was used in all gamma analyses to compute the pass rate, following the recommendations of AAPM Task Group 218 for photon-based intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (QA) [42].…”
Section: Experimental Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, a distance to agreement (DTA) in the depth direction was considered to account for any uncertainties associated with depth positioning. Planar 2D gamma analyses were carried out using criteria of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm to evaluate the expected agreement range, however, the 3%/ 3 mm criterion is widely adopted clinically for PBS proton therapy [35,[39][40][41]. A dose threshold of 10% was used in all gamma analyses to compute the pass rate, following the recommendations of AAPM Task Group 218 for photon-based intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance (QA) [42].…”
Section: Experimental Dosimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%