1984
DOI: 10.2307/2443331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Root Apical Meristem of Osmunda regalis

Abstract: Roots of the Osmundaceae differ from most ferns in having more than one apical cell. The size of the apical initial group, which includes cells that are considered to be apical cells, varies directly with root diameter in Osmunda regalis L. Mitotic indices were 6.63% for apical cells, 7.45% for the entire apical group, 6.25% for distal derivatives, and 7.15% for developing cortical cells. Cytophotometric measurements of Fuelgen‐stained nuclei indicated no endopolyploidy in the populations of cells studied. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers consider the Osmundales to be closely related to eusporangiate ferns ( Pryer et al, 2001 ; 2004 ; Schneider et al, 2004 ; Schuettpelz and Pryer, 2007 ; Wolf et al, 1995 ). Osmun-dales also have been considered as intermediate taxa between eusporangiate and leptosporangiate ferns based on their external appearance, and anatomical and meristem characteristics ( Cross, 1931a ; 1931b ; Freeberg and Gifford Jr, 1984 ; Gifford Jr, 1983 ). Using fossil records, Osmundaceae could be traced back to the Late Permian period, but the genus Osmunda was known from the Late Triassic period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers consider the Osmundales to be closely related to eusporangiate ferns ( Pryer et al, 2001 ; 2004 ; Schneider et al, 2004 ; Schuettpelz and Pryer, 2007 ; Wolf et al, 1995 ). Osmun-dales also have been considered as intermediate taxa between eusporangiate and leptosporangiate ferns based on their external appearance, and anatomical and meristem characteristics ( Cross, 1931a ; 1931b ; Freeberg and Gifford Jr, 1984 ; Gifford Jr, 1983 ). Using fossil records, Osmundaceae could be traced back to the Late Permian period, but the genus Osmunda was known from the Late Triassic period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAMs of very old and large Angiopteris and Osmunda plants reportedly have a group of apical cells instead of a single apical cell, (Freeberg and Gifford, ; Barlow, ). We did not observe rows of apical cells in such large RAMs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect of RAM evolution in vascular plants, Boronin (from 1969, as cited by Barlow, ) proposed a hypothesis that the propensity to form centrally placed tetrahedral apical cells may be a primitive characteristic and that plural initial cells in seed plants evolved first through polyhedral apical cells (increase in cutting facets), followed over time by the development of a cluster of apical cells, as found in Osmunda and Angiopteris , phylogenetically basal groups of ferns (monilophytes). Actually, the RAMs of Angiopteris (Angiopteridaceae) and Osmunda (Osmundaceae) were once reported to have plural initial cells when old (Freeberg and Gifford, ) and were classified as the open type, similar to angiosperm RAMs (Clowes, ). However, our PD data clearly show that RAMs of both genera ( Osmunda and Angiopteris ) have an LPD (fern type), not an IPD (seed‐plant type) or intermediate type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conard (1908) described apical organization for Dennstaedtia punctilobula and summarized the results ofresearch on fern root apical structure up to that date. The early investigators were impressed with the tetrahedral apical cell as the progenitor of all building units of fern roots, although one definite apical cell is not apparent, for example, in Osmunda (Freeberg and Gifford, 1984) and in the Marattiaceae (Bower, 1889). However, Schiiepp (1966) has presented an analysis of root apical structure in Angiopteris (Marattiaceae) in which he purports to demonstrate the presence of a cubical cell that is responsible for the initiation of the observed cell network.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%