2008
DOI: 10.1130/g24590a.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The roof of an axial magma chamber: A hornfelsic heat exchanger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
91
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
11
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The granoblastic dikes and underlying dike screens represent the conductive boundary layer between mafic magma and the overlying hydrothermal system, and the rocks from Hole 1256D are similar to those observed in ophiolites and elsewhere in oceanic crust (e.g., Gillis and Roberts, 1999;Gillis, 2008;France et al, 2009). The granoblastic basalt sampled beneath Gabbro 2 during Expedition 335 is part of a dike screen within the transition from sheeted dikes to gabbros, consistent with the presence of a significant underlying gabbro heat source.…”
Section: Alteration and Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The granoblastic dikes and underlying dike screens represent the conductive boundary layer between mafic magma and the overlying hydrothermal system, and the rocks from Hole 1256D are similar to those observed in ophiolites and elsewhere in oceanic crust (e.g., Gillis and Roberts, 1999;Gillis, 2008;France et al, 2009). The granoblastic basalt sampled beneath Gabbro 2 during Expedition 335 is part of a dike screen within the transition from sheeted dikes to gabbros, consistent with the presence of a significant underlying gabbro heat source.…”
Section: Alteration and Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gillis and Coogan, 2002), and are consistent with melting at the top of the shallow melt lens. The depth of the melt lens, however, may vary due to migration within crust over time and, therefore, the melt may interact with the upper gabbros and/ or lower sheeted dikes (Gillis, 2008). If alteration is caused by circulation of hydrothermal fluids, it is likely that this is largely restricted by permeability to the base of the sheeted dikes and uppermost gabbros of Layer 3.…”
Section: Composition Of Potential Assimilantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…values derived from metamorphic data at the dike-gabbro transition in ophiolites and at fast-spread oceanic settings (e.g., Hess and Pito Deep [Gillis, 2008]). Assuming that heat is extracted over a 1 km-wide AMC [Kent et al, 1990] this heat flux would provide about 30 MW per km of ridge, which is within estimates of time-averaged values of heat available per kilometer of ridge axis [Wilcock and Delaney, 1996;Mottl, 2003;Cannat et al, 2004].…”
Section: Heat Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of our model, this could be explained in two ways: 1) that subcritical (in regard to hydrothermal convection) permeabilities (<10 −16 m 2 ) characterize the axial lithosphere above high crystallinity AMC sections, or 2) that crustal permeability above the mushy sections is moderate (∼10 −14 -10 −15 m 2 ) and comparable to values used in our model (Figure 3), but that high-temperature fluids do not make it to the seafloor because of fluid-rock interactions (e.g., mineral precipitation [Fontaine et al, 2001]), mixing and cooling of hydrothermal fluids along the volcanic sections, and/or permeability structure [e.g., Wilcock, 1998]. In this latter case, the hydrothermal circulation will mine heat from the AMC and either replenishment rates commensurate to the AMC cooling rates reproduced in our models are required to ensure steady-state, or the magmato-hydrothermal transition will propagate downward as described by Gillis [2008]. In this respect, it is worth noting that our model considers a uniform permeability hydrothermal layer.…”
Section: Amc Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%