“…Out of the vegetal sample sprinkled with a non-polar solvent (ethylic ether, petroleum ether, benzene, hexane, clorophorm etc), then with a medium polarity solvent (ethanol, methanol) and only in the ned with water, the following fractions were obtained, [6,7,8]: As a follow up of the identification reactions previously discussed, the following results were obtained, summarized in Table 1, 2, 3, 4. a fraction of the etheric extract was evaporated up to dryness; the residuum obtained was dissolved in alcohol -the resulting solution does not have the specific smell of volatile oils for any of the algae species; the residuum obtained from the evaporation of the etheric extract was processed with HCl 2%; the solution undertook the Mayer and Bertrand reactions; the reactions were negative; the analyzed algae do not contain basic alcaloids; the residuum obtained from the evaporation of the etheric extract was processed with methilic alcohol; the alcoholic solution undertook the Shibata reactions; the reaction was negative for all algae species, which do not contain flavonoic aglicones the residuum obtained from the evaporation of the etheric extract was processed with amonium hydroxyde; the Borntrager reactive did not colout the solution orange; the analyzed algae do not contain endemoles; the Lieberman -Burchard reaction on the etheric extract was positive, indicating the presence of steroles and triterpenes in all analyzed algae; the Carr -Price reaction was positive, thus they contain carotenoids, for the species Cladophora vagabunda, Ulva rigida, and negative for the other species; the residuum obtained from the evaporation of the etheric extract was processed with amonium hydroxyde; the solution did not present an intense fluorescence on UV radiation, thus no species contains cumarines.…”