2000
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x-29.4.733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Roles of Vision and Antennal Olfaction in Enemy Avoidance by Three Predatory Heteropterans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because antennal olfaction appears to be the primary sensory mechanism by which these predators locate prey, it is interesting to postulate why these species have such large, welldeveloped compound eyes. Other studies conducted in our laboratory suggest that for Nabicula subcoleoptrata and S. diadema, vision is critical to these species in another important activity, the avoidance of their own enemies (Freund and Olmstead 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because antennal olfaction appears to be the primary sensory mechanism by which these predators locate prey, it is interesting to postulate why these species have such large, welldeveloped compound eyes. Other studies conducted in our laboratory suggest that for Nabicula subcoleoptrata and S. diadema, vision is critical to these species in another important activity, the avoidance of their own enemies (Freund and Olmstead 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A survey of sensory modalities used in foraging (Freund and Olmstead 2000) indicated that terrestrial heteropterans employ olfaction and/or chemoreception and may also use vision and mechanoreception to locate prey. Unfortunately, relatively few published studies have included sensory manipulations of these predators (see Ambrose et al 1983Ambrose et al , 1986Awan et al 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Despite the known importance of visual capabilities in the face of predation (Freund and Olmstead ; Kelley and Magurran ; Moller and Erritzoe ; Smolka et al. ; Hettyey et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, work has also shown that predators target heavily pigmented eyes and may therefore select for the evolution of a smaller eye (Zaret and Kerfoot 1975;Lonnstedt et al 2013). Despite the known importance of visual capabilities in the face of predation (Freund and Olmstead 2000;Kelley and Magurran 2003;Moller and Erritzoe 2010;Smolka et al 2011;Hettyey et al 2012), and other visually driven behaviors that are both directly and indirectly related to fitness (Dobberfuhl et al 2005; Thomas et al 2006;Hall 2008;Liu et al 2012), the extent to which predators exert selection and drive the evolution of eye size is unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound measurements revealed no evidence that nabids use acoustic signals (Leston, 1957), and the extent to which they use visual cues to find mates is unknown (Freund & Olmstead, 2000;Roth & Remane, 2003). A role for chemical cues in sexual attraction has been suggested for nabids (Harris, 1928;Söcknick, 1974;Carayon, 1977;Pericart, 1987;Hartwig, 1990;Roth & Remane, 2003), but the evidence so far concerns the existence of male pheromones in the nabid Prostemma guttula (Kott, 2000) only (see Aldrich, 1988Aldrich, , 1995.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%