2011
DOI: 10.1177/0044118x11421940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Roles of Perceived Neighborhood Disorganization, Social Cohesion, and Social Control in Urban Thai Adolescents’ Substance Use and Delinquency

Abstract: Substance use and delinquency in Thai adolescents are growing public health concerns. Research has linked neighborhood characteristics to these outcomes, with explanations focused on neighborhood disorganization, social cohesion, and social control. This study examines the independent associations of these neighborhood constructs with Thai adolescents’ substance use and delinquency, through peer deviance, to determine which neighborhood aspects are particularly important. Families (N=420) with adolescents aged… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to cultural modifications, a module targeting risky adolescent sexual behavior was added. This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01AA015672) and features an international collaborative team composed of investigators from the PIRE (USA), Mahidol University, Chiang Mai University, and CSN & Associates (Thailand) as well as an American Program Advisor to the Thailand Ministry of Public Health (see Miller, et al 2008; Byrnes et al, 2009; Chamratrithirong, et al, 2009; Rhuchareonpornpanich, et al 2010). The study, including its data collection activities, was approved by both the PIRE IRB and the IRB Committee of the Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to cultural modifications, a module targeting risky adolescent sexual behavior was added. This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01AA015672) and features an international collaborative team composed of investigators from the PIRE (USA), Mahidol University, Chiang Mai University, and CSN & Associates (Thailand) as well as an American Program Advisor to the Thailand Ministry of Public Health (see Miller, et al 2008; Byrnes et al, 2009; Chamratrithirong, et al, 2009; Rhuchareonpornpanich, et al 2010). The study, including its data collection activities, was approved by both the PIRE IRB and the IRB Committee of the Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores ranged from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for refusing sex Of the original 20 items, 13 items were deleted, 5 were used, 2 were modified, and 3 were added to assess the perception of structural characteristics of the neighborhood related to adolescent risk behaviors Responses were measured on a 4 point ordinal scale, ranging from "not a problem" to "big problem". Scores ranged from 0 to 30, with higher scores reflecting higher perceived neighborhood disorganization Byrnes et al (2013) 10 (α = .95) Is there a problem in your neighborhood with sexual assaults or rapes?…”
Section: Sexual Refusal Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the original 4 items, 3 items were deleted, 1 was used, and 1 was added to assess the likelihood that their neighbors would intervene in a risky situation, including adolescents skipping school and hanging out in risky spots Responses were measured on a 4 point scale, ranging from "very unlikely" to "very likely". Scores ranged from 2 to 8, with higher scores reflected higher perceived neighborhood social control Byrnes et al (2013) 2 (α = .85) What is the likelihood that your neighbors could intervene once adolescents were skipping school?…”
Section: Neighborhood Social Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the level of social cohesion of a neighborhood may be more beneficial to the perceived social adjustment and academic outcomes of adolescents compared with children. That may be the case because neighbors are more likely to assist and intervene before adolescent issues get out of hand (Byrnes et al, 2013;Cantillon, 2006). Additionally, the lack of significant direct associations (noted previously) could also indicate that the paths between these factors and perceived developmental outcomes were fully mediated by parenting stress, parental wellbeing, and parent-child interactions (Baron & Kenny, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%