1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)90778-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The roles of amylose and amylopectin in the gelation and retrogradation of starch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

23
536
3
11

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,093 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
23
536
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of native amylopectin con®rmed that 30% of the starch was not gelatinised during cooking because of hydrothermic conditions unfavourable to starch gelatinisation. In the present study, HAWB was kept at 7 20 C for 3±12 months, which probably caused amylopectin retrogradation (Kulp & Ponte, 1981;Miles et al, 1985). However, it has been determined that amylopectin in crystalline form does not modify starch digestibility (Rabe & Sievert, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The presence of native amylopectin con®rmed that 30% of the starch was not gelatinised during cooking because of hydrothermic conditions unfavourable to starch gelatinisation. In the present study, HAWB was kept at 7 20 C for 3±12 months, which probably caused amylopectin retrogradation (Kulp & Ponte, 1981;Miles et al, 1985). However, it has been determined that amylopectin in crystalline form does not modify starch digestibility (Rabe & Sievert, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Sandhu and Singh (2007) reported peak viscosity in the range between 67.0 and 104.5 RVU and break down viscosity range with 27.0 to 115.7 RVU for selected corn lines. Miles et al (1985) reported that increase in final viscosity might be due to the aggregation of the amylose molecules. Pasting properties are dependent on the rigidity of starch granules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. 16) (Miles et a/.• 1985 ;Gidley, 1989 Legum e starcheshave been shown to eldn"bit high retrogradation rates (Hoover & Sosulski, 1985a;Tjahjadi & Breece, 1984). This makes native legume surcbes unsuitab le for use in many co mmercial foods.…”
Section: Retrogradationmentioning
confidence: 99%