The Role of Work-in-Process Inventory in Serial Production Lines

Abstract

In serial production systems, storage may be provided between processes to avoid interference due to lack of synchronization. This paper investigates the behavior of lines buffered in this way and explores the distribution and quantity of work-in-process (WIP) inventory that accumulates. We study simple, generic production systems to gain insight into the behavior of more complex systems. The authors are surprised by the sometimes counterintuitive results, but are joined in this surprise by both academics and practitioners with whom the study has been discussed. Results are presented for: identical workstations with and without buffers; balanced lines in which variability of processing times differs between stations; unbalanced lines; and lines with unreliable workstations. In general, buffers between workstations increase system capacity but with sharply diminishing returns. Position as well as capacity of the buffers are important. These results are preliminary, to be confirmed and extended by further study—indeed, a primary purpose of this paper is to stimulate such study. However, even these preliminary results yield design guidelines that should be useful in industrial practice.

Order Lead-Time Improvement following Enterprise Information Technology Implementation: An Empirical Study

“…From a general standpoint, the theory of swift, even flow is grounded on a number of wellestablished laws of operational dynamics. One of these is the law of variability (from queuing theory), which outlines the benefits to process-throughput that reductions in processvariability can provide (see, for example, Conway et al 1988;Kannan and Palocsayl999;Powell and Schulz 2004).…”

Optimal Control of a Two-Station Tandem Production/Inventory System

“…Under a finite buffer policy (see, e.g., Conway et al 1988) the system operates as two tandem, finite capacity ./M/1/ci queues. The buffer size is c between stations and c 2 for FG; the policy is Bl = f{x: x 1 < c} and 32 = {x:…”

“…All of the environments described thus far are exogenous demand, or "pull" systems. Unlimited demand "push" systems can be modelled as closed queueing networks; buffer placement for these systems has been studied by Conway et al (1988). Kanban policies, pioneered by Toyota (Sugimori et al 1977), are studied by Mitra and Mitrani (1990) and Muckstadt and Tayur (1991) in an unlimited demand setting.…”

Managing the trade-off implications of global supply

“…Batch-processing environments have very few bottlenecks (resources constraints), however, the inherent spare capacity in such processes is not effectively utilised to enable flow (Conway et al, 1988) as cost models and local efficiency measures typically drive the operational decisions, as already discussed. …”