2010
DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.527862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of word familiarity in Spanish/English bilingual word recognition

Abstract: Despite high familiarity of most test words, clinicians should be aware of the residual effects of familiarity on the English word test even after most unfamiliar words are removed, regardless of clients' language dominance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assert the validity and reliability of a speech test, the principle of phonemic balance (PB) has been applied for a long time in the development of monosyllabic materials [16][17][18] . Other important principles in designing speech test materials are the familiarity of test items and the number of test items [2,16,19] . Typically, 50-items word lists are adopted in word recognition tests [2,15,18,20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assert the validity and reliability of a speech test, the principle of phonemic balance (PB) has been applied for a long time in the development of monosyllabic materials [16][17][18] . Other important principles in designing speech test materials are the familiarity of test items and the number of test items [2,16,19] . Typically, 50-items word lists are adopted in word recognition tests [2,15,18,20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shi and Sanchez (2011 ) have found that word familiarity aff ected word recognition in monolingual tasks. In a study of aphasia, researchers have found that word familiarity aff ects reaction time and accuracy in vocabulary acquisition tasks; a similar result was also found in an auditory task (Dorry, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Word recognition in listeners as a function of language dominance has been frequently reported in the literature (e.g., Shi & Morozova, 2012;Shi & Sánchez, 2011;Shi & Zaki, 2014), but those studies could not pinpoint the source for this intergroup difference. Shi and Morozova (2012), for example, focused their investigation on phonemic errors (mainly an acoustic-phonetic phenomenon but complicated by a possible lexical effect), whereas Shi and Sánchez (2011) examined the effect of word familiarity. As such, the Boothroyd and Nittrouer (1988) approach used in this study offered a unique avenue for assessing both cues in two groups of nonnative listeners differing in their language background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Language dominance captures a bilingual individual's language profile and has been reliably used to characterize bilingual participants in past work involving auditory recognition of linguistic materials (Shi & Morozova, 2012;Shi & Sánchez, 2011;Shi & Zaki, 2014). Fourteen and 15 nonnative listeners reported English and Russian to be their dominant language on the Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (Marian, Blumenfeld, & Kaushanskaya, 2007) and included the English-dominant (ED) and Russiandominant (RD) group, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%