2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of visual spatial attention in audiovisual speech perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
8
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, there was a qualitative difference in audiovisual speech perception. When an acoustic /p/ was presented with a visual /k/, the control participants heard this McGurk stimulus predominantly in accordance with the visual component (as in our previous studies using the same stimuli; Andersen et al 2009;Tiippana et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, there was a qualitative difference in audiovisual speech perception. When an acoustic /p/ was presented with a visual /k/, the control participants heard this McGurk stimulus predominantly in accordance with the visual component (as in our previous studies using the same stimuli; Andersen et al 2009;Tiippana et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We have used these stimuli in previous studies, and they elicit a McGurk effect of hearing the stimulus in accordance with the visual component in typically developed populations (Andersen et al 2009;Tiippana et al 2010). Therefore, we expected the control participants to hear 'k' for the former stimulus (ApVk), and 't' for the latter stimulus (ApVt).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate pilot study (N = 14) we obtained similar results when we asked typical readers to report what they heard (instead of perceived). The rate of visual-based responses also exceeded the rate of fusion responses possibly because the visually presented /aka/ was clearly recognizable and thus did not support the /ata/ interpretation (see Tiippana, 2014, for a similar argument and, e.g., Andersen, Tiippana, Laarni, Kojo, & Sams, 2009;Saalasti et al, 2012, for similar patterns).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that 4-mo-old infants are already able to correctly match a sound with a face Meltzoff, 1982, 1984). When subjects are presented with an auditory source dubbed on a screen containing two faces, visual spatial attention is also able to choose between the faces when lipreading (Andersen et al, 2009). Selective attention to the appropriate face has been correlated with steady-state visual evoked potentials on the visual scalp (Senkowski et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%