2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of vegetation and litter in the nitrogen dynamics of riparian buffer zones in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
147
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
147
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that soil disturbance can cause local and temporal changes in soil properties such as aeration, pH, nutrient availability and in microbial community composition and activity (Allison and Martiny 2008;Dorland et al 2003;Wagner et al 2015;Wardle et al 2004), which all are known to affect litter decomposition (e.g., Hattenschwiler et al 2005;Veen et al 2015). In addition to previous studies however, our results now show that such disturbance effects can be modulated by litter type and flooding history.…”
Section: Legacy Effects Of Turf Originmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…It is well known that soil disturbance can cause local and temporal changes in soil properties such as aeration, pH, nutrient availability and in microbial community composition and activity (Allison and Martiny 2008;Dorland et al 2003;Wagner et al 2015;Wardle et al 2004), which all are known to affect litter decomposition (e.g., Hattenschwiler et al 2005;Veen et al 2015). In addition to previous studies however, our results now show that such disturbance effects can be modulated by litter type and flooding history.…”
Section: Legacy Effects Of Turf Originmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…Samples were placed in plastic bags and taken back to the laboratory. Root samples were washed out of the soil as gently as possible through a 0.5 mm sieve and then dead roots were removed according to the method provided by Hefting et al (2005). Before measurements, all live roots were sealed in self-styled bags and placed in a cold chamber at 5°C (Burylo et al 2011).…”
Section: Field Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of each step should be selected based on the typical time scale at 20 which hydrological processes happen in the simulated system. For example, the typical time scale for flow in 21 sandy-loamy soils is 1 d (Hefting et al, 2005;Kirschbaum, 1999). This value was used in the simulations 22 reported here, while for a coarser material (e.g., sandy gravel) a smaller time step would be required, as 23 coarse materials drain faster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%