2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Ultrasonography in Predicting Vesicoureteral Reflux

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
19
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a normal US cannot exclude high-grade VUR, most grades IV and V VUR are detected on US. 12,[36][37][38] Our findings are in agreement with previous reports of identifying most grades IV-V VUR on US, 12,36-38 indicating that when US findings are normal in children after a UTI, the risk of missing grades IV-V VUR is low. Therefore, we suggest a less aggressive diagnostic approach like US in the first management of children after a first UTI to identify the high-risk group for whom a further imaging workup is necessary.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although a normal US cannot exclude high-grade VUR, most grades IV and V VUR are detected on US. 12,[36][37][38] Our findings are in agreement with previous reports of identifying most grades IV-V VUR on US, 12,36-38 indicating that when US findings are normal in children after a UTI, the risk of missing grades IV-V VUR is low. Therefore, we suggest a less aggressive diagnostic approach like US in the first management of children after a first UTI to identify the high-risk group for whom a further imaging workup is necessary.…”
Section: A C C E P T E Dsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We herein demonstrate that grade IV specificity remains high, with a significant increase in sensitivity compared to grade III, during USG use. Kovanlıkaya et al (25) indicated that, for reflux grades IV and V, RU can accurately predict the presence of reflux, with only 4.5% of grade IV patients and 0.7% of grade V patients misdiagnosed using renal bladder USG alone. In another recent study, RU was highly accurate for the prediction of VUR; the authors concluded that a normal RU largely excluded high grades (i.e., grades IV and V) in pediatric patients with UTI and mild renal scarring (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer AAP guidelines from 2011 recommend that patients with normal USG should not undergo VCUG until a second UTI . However, some investigators fear the potential risk of kidney damage in children with clinically‐significant VUR when VCUG is delayed until a second UTI, but others concur with the 2011 AAP guidelines because patients with grade 4–5 VUR rarely show normal USG findings, and moderate to severe hydronephrosis is rarely detected in patients with low‐grade VUR less than 4 . In contrast, 24% of patients with high‐grade VUR show normal USG findings .…”
Section: Moves To Reduce Vcugmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because USG and VCUG provide important different information on the genitourinary tract, they should be considered complementary . Normal USG findings do not exclude high‐grade VUR, and have little ability to definitively diagnose VUR; thus, USG cannot replace VCUG in the diagnosis of VUR, but has a role to play in selecting patients who need VCUG …”
Section: Are There Any Alternatives To Vcug?mentioning
confidence: 99%