The Role of Trust in Natural Resource Management Conflicts: A Forestry Case Study from Germany

Juerges, Natalie; Viedma, Alisa; Leahy, Jessica; Newig, Jens

doi:10.5849/fs-2016-050

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is in line with earlier findings (e.g., Juerges, Viedma, Leahy, & Newig, 2017;San Antonio & Gamage, 2007). This is in line with earlier findings (e.g., Juerges, Viedma, Leahy, & Newig, 2017;San Antonio & Gamage, 2007).…”

Section: Building Trust and Partnershipssupporting

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Joint knowledge production for improved climate services: Insights from the Swedish forestry sector

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Science-stakeholder collaboration is becoming an increasingly common way to address mismatches between the knowledge needs of stakeholders and the research being done by scientists. This kind of mismatch is clearly evident in the field of climate change adaptation, arguing for the design and application of user-and decision-driven, coproduced climate services. Science-based participatory processes have shown clear benefits in establishing arenas for joint knowledge production on climate change and adaptation.However, multiple challenges remain. This paper presents and discusses findings from an assessment of a participatory climate services process conducted as part of a research program on climate change adaptation in the Swedish forestry sector. We identify enablers and barriers to successful science-stakeholder collaboration and put forward recommendations for more stakeholder-driven, participatory coproduction processes. Our analysis offers insights that could help achieve more informed decision-making and policy development and ultimately climate action under the Paris Agreement.

show abstract

Section: Building Trust and Partnershipssupporting

confidence: 94%

“…Our findings also underline the importance of trust and partnership building. This is in line with earlier findings (e.g., Juerges, Viedma, Leahy, & Newig, 2017;San Antonio & Gamage, 2007). Trust and partnership building are linked to process design and facilitation style (Reed, 2008).…”

Section: Building Trust and Partnershipssupporting

confidence: 92%

Joint knowledge production for improved climate services: Insights from the Swedish forestry sector

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, instead of policy implementation with elements of distrust, in order to implement the policy successfully, trust and dialogue are needed (Young et al 2016). Conflict resolution depends on collaboration and relationship building between stakeholders and who are interdependent in the realisation of their goals (Zachrisson and Beland Lindahl 2013) and a level of trust in each other (Juerges et al 2018).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholder perceptions, management and impacts of forestry conflicts in southern Sweden

Jakobsson

Olofsson

Ambrose-Oji

2020

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Trust towards other participants as well as governmental actors has repeatedly been identified as a factor for the 'success' of collaborative governance (Emerson & Nabatchi, 2015), and specifically as conducive to learning (Juerges, Weber, Leahy, & Newig, 2018;Leach et al, 2013). Trusting others arguably makes the uptake of information and the updating of beliefs more likely.…”

Section: Factors Characterizing Contextual Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning in participatory environmental governance – its antecedents and effects. Findings from a case survey meta-analysis

Newig

Jager

Kochskämper

et al. 2019

Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Theory on participatory and collaborative governance maintains that learning is essential to achieve good environmental outcomes. Empirical research has mostly produced individual case studies, and reliable evidence on both antecedents and environmental outcomes of learning remains sparse. Given conceptual ambiguities in the literature, we define governance-related learning in a threefold way: learning as deliberation; as knowledge-and capacity-building; and as informing environmental outputs. We develop nine propositions that explain learning through factors characterizing governance process and context, and three propositions explaining environmental outcomes of learning. We test these propositions drawing on the 'SCAPE' database of 307 published case studies of environmental decision-making, using multiple regression models. Results show that learning in all three modes is explained to some extent by a combination of process-and context-related factors. Most factors matter for learning, but with stark differences across the three modes of learning, thus demonstrating the relevance of this differentiated approach. Learning modes build on one another: Deliberation is seen to explain both capacity building and informed outputs, while informed outputs are also explained by capacity building. Contrary to our expectations, none of the learning variables was found to significantly affect environmental outcomes when considered alongside the process-and context-related variables.

show abstract

The Role of Trust in Natural Resource Management Conflicts: A Forestry Case Study from Germany

Cited by 3 publications

References 30 publications

Joint knowledge production for improved climate services: Insights from the Swedish forestry sector

Joint knowledge production for improved climate services: Insights from the Swedish forestry sector

Stakeholder perceptions, management and impacts of forestry conflicts in southern Sweden

Learning in participatory environmental governance – its antecedents and effects. Findings from a case survey meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About