2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Amp; Exposition Proceedings
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--29008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Trust in Collaborative Research Settings: Opportunities for Future Research in Graduate Engineering Education

Abstract: Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research interests include graduate-level engineering education, including inter-and multidisciplinary graduate education, online engineering cognition and learning, and engineering communication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotional and interpersonal skills are infrequently talked about as competencies for providing SR services (Townsend et al, 2017). However, research team dynamics are affected by relationships, power dynamics, trust, and demands on time (Thurow et al, 1999;Whitehair & Berdanier, 2017). Key approaches for engaging patient partners and other stakeholders in reviews include relationship building, clear communication, and clarity on roles and time commitments (Black et al, 2018;Boden et al, 2021;Hamilton et al, 2018;Pollock et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implications For Librarians Providing Synthesis Review Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional and interpersonal skills are infrequently talked about as competencies for providing SR services (Townsend et al, 2017). However, research team dynamics are affected by relationships, power dynamics, trust, and demands on time (Thurow et al, 1999;Whitehair & Berdanier, 2017). Key approaches for engaging patient partners and other stakeholders in reviews include relationship building, clear communication, and clarity on roles and time commitments (Black et al, 2018;Boden et al, 2021;Hamilton et al, 2018;Pollock et al, 2021).…”
Section: Implications For Librarians Providing Synthesis Review Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%