Abstract:Working towards sustainable solutions requires involving professionals and stakeholders from all sectors of society into research and teaching. This often presents a challenge to scholars at universities, as they lack capacity and time needed for negotiating different agendas, languages, competencies, and cultures among faculty, students, and stakeholders. Management approaches and quality criteria have been developed to cope with this challenge, including concepts of boundary organizations, transdisciplinary … Show more
“…Such a coordinator would foster organizational learning across the network and maintain a network 'memory'-providing information, facilitate collaborative arrangements, do trouble shooting, if necessary, and evaluate success and failure of collaborative efforts. Considering the inter-and transdisciplinary nature of almost all empirical sustainability projects, such a coordinator might benefit from specific training on how to facilitate collaboration at several interfaces (e.g., between disciplines or between scientists and stakeholders) (Brundiers et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It departs from sustainability science as outlined by (Kates et al 2001) that calls for descriptiveanalytical knowledge on origin, structure, and functioning of sustainability problems to advance understanding of resilience and vulnerability in social-ecological systems. In transformational sustainability science, actionable knowledge is generated on solutions that alleviate the symptoms or change the underlying causal structures of sustainability problems (Wiek et al 2012;Brundiers et al 2013). To achieve these objectives, universities are increasingly engaged in multistakeholder, transdisciplinary efforts to catalyze sustainability transformation Trencher et al 2014a).…”
A promising approach for addressing sustainability problems is to recognize the unique conditions of a particular place, such as problem features and solution capabilities, and adopt and adapt solutions developed at other places around the world. Therefore, research and teaching in international networks becomes critical, as it allows for accelerating learning by sharing problem understandings, successful solutions, and important contextual considerations. This article identifies eight distinct types of research and teaching collaborations in international networks that can support such accelerated learning. The four research types are, with increasing intensity of collaboration: (1) solution adoption; (2) solution consultation; (3) joint research on different problems; and (4) joint research on similar problems. The four teaching types are, with increasing intensity of collaboration: (1) adopted course; (2) course with visiting faculty; (3) joint course with traveling faculty; and (4) joint course with traveling students. The typology is illustrated by extending existing research and teaching projects on urban sustainability in the International Network of Programs in Sustainability, with partner universities from Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa. The article concludes with challenges and strategies for extending individual projects into collaborations in international networks.
“…Such a coordinator would foster organizational learning across the network and maintain a network 'memory'-providing information, facilitate collaborative arrangements, do trouble shooting, if necessary, and evaluate success and failure of collaborative efforts. Considering the inter-and transdisciplinary nature of almost all empirical sustainability projects, such a coordinator might benefit from specific training on how to facilitate collaboration at several interfaces (e.g., between disciplines or between scientists and stakeholders) (Brundiers et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It departs from sustainability science as outlined by (Kates et al 2001) that calls for descriptiveanalytical knowledge on origin, structure, and functioning of sustainability problems to advance understanding of resilience and vulnerability in social-ecological systems. In transformational sustainability science, actionable knowledge is generated on solutions that alleviate the symptoms or change the underlying causal structures of sustainability problems (Wiek et al 2012;Brundiers et al 2013). To achieve these objectives, universities are increasingly engaged in multistakeholder, transdisciplinary efforts to catalyze sustainability transformation Trencher et al 2014a).…”
A promising approach for addressing sustainability problems is to recognize the unique conditions of a particular place, such as problem features and solution capabilities, and adopt and adapt solutions developed at other places around the world. Therefore, research and teaching in international networks becomes critical, as it allows for accelerating learning by sharing problem understandings, successful solutions, and important contextual considerations. This article identifies eight distinct types of research and teaching collaborations in international networks that can support such accelerated learning. The four research types are, with increasing intensity of collaboration: (1) solution adoption; (2) solution consultation; (3) joint research on different problems; and (4) joint research on similar problems. The four teaching types are, with increasing intensity of collaboration: (1) adopted course; (2) course with visiting faculty; (3) joint course with traveling faculty; and (4) joint course with traveling students. The typology is illustrated by extending existing research and teaching projects on urban sustainability in the International Network of Programs in Sustainability, with partner universities from Europe, North America, Asia, and Africa. The article concludes with challenges and strategies for extending individual projects into collaborations in international networks.
“…Since EfS/ESD pedagogy focuses on students and their engagement with issues and interactions outside of the class-room, an individual teacher/academic may need support to implement the curriculum. The contribution of Brundiers Wiek and Kay [6] specifically considers the need for a "transacademic interface manager" to support those participatory education efforts that are frequently an identifying feature of sustainability education and research. Their article, they say "provides practical guidance to universities on how to organize these critical endeavors more effectively" [6] (p. 4614), and intriguingly suggests that the idea of these managers can "offer students an additional career perspective" [6] (p. 4614) For those considering the potential benefits of establishing a transacademic interface manager role, or developing curriculum to develop related capabilities in graduates, Brundiers, Wiek and Kay [6] provide a rich description of the role and its development.…”
Education for Sustainability (EfS) and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) have been under discussion for some two decades. The UN Decade for Education for Sustainable Development 2004-2014 has provided a most important focus for ESD, and for its facilitation. However, while the Decade raised awareness of the need for ESD generally, and particularly in Higher Education, discussion of how this education can be effectively delivered to learners is still gaining momentum. This is especially the situation when considering EfS/ESD in Higher Education Institutions (HEI).Yet HEIs have the task of preparing graduates for professional employment, where they will be expected to apply their learning. As a consequence, the connections between the relevant theories and knowledge associated with EfS/ESD and their practical applications are critical. Similarly, culture and praxis of a discipline are important as they will influence the way that the learning experiences are developed. Equally the competencies (or capabilities, skills) expected of graduates, by both the HEI and employers, will have a direct bearing on both the content of learning experiences and how they are presented to students. The role of values, and the role of the learner in assisting the goals of EfS/ESD are also considerations in the development of curriculum.More broadly, these considerations, and many others, are critical to the development of a science of teaching and learning for EfS/ESD. While we have seen examples of discussion of the content and direction of EfS/ESD in HEIs, discussion of the pedagogy of EfS/ESD is less evident.Hence, this special issue of Sustainability sought to gain some understanding of the direction of the discussion about pedagogy, an indication of what has been achieved, and where attention is required. The task was to seek contributions from scholars and practitioners whose theoretical or practical works examine issues associated with the development and delivery of curriculum, to contribute to the emerging discussion around the pedagogy for EfS/ESD in HEIs.While the content that is included in EfS/ESD is clearly important, so too is the process by which that content is conveyed to learners. A most important component of the pedagogy associated with EfS/ESD is the process by which learners experience the material and values. This is the central theme of the contribution by Barth and Burandt [1], who emphasise the importance of learner centred OPEN ACCESS
“…A second target for future research lies in the professionalization of both teachers and stakeholders, who also need support to be able to effectively work in universitycommunity partnerships (Brundiers et al, 2013). A focus group discussion on effective student-stakeholder support, held with 14 RLE teachers after the closure of the eight studied RLEs (February 2016), showed that teachers were mainly occupied with organisational aspects of school-stakeholder collaboration, and showed yet limited openness for the further development of actual student-stakeholder support.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guzmán-Valenzuela, 2015). However, studies contributing to this debate only pay oblique attention to what is required from teachers to perform in university-community collaborative practices (Brundiers et al, 2013;Stauffacher et al, 2006). Until the date, a systematic identification of roles and tasks that teachers fulfil in a university-community collaborative learning environment, and the competencies that teachers should master to carry out these tasks, has not been done.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.