The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1994
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1994.12.12.2640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of thymidylate synthase expression in prognosis and outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Abstract: The expression of TS is an important independent prognosticator of disease-free survival and survival in patients with rectal cancer. Adjuvant fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival for patients with high TS levels. Prospective studies measuring TS levels will be needed to understand further the role of TS as a prognosticator of survival and chemotherapeutic benefit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

11
230
5
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
230
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirdly, it is also possible that adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect survival regardless of TS expression, which may explain the lack of difference in survival between high-TS and low-TS groups in the current study. Alternatively, there is a possibility that the gastric cancer patients with high TS expression might experience a greater survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy compared to patients with low TS expression, as shown in other studies with rectal cancer and breast cancer (Johnston et al, 1994;Pestalozzi et al, 1997). In the current study, there was no significant difference in survival according to important prognostic variables such as Lauren's classification, lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirdly, it is also possible that adjuvant chemotherapy did not affect survival regardless of TS expression, which may explain the lack of difference in survival between high-TS and low-TS groups in the current study. Alternatively, there is a possibility that the gastric cancer patients with high TS expression might experience a greater survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy compared to patients with low TS expression, as shown in other studies with rectal cancer and breast cancer (Johnston et al, 1994;Pestalozzi et al, 1997). In the current study, there was no significant difference in survival according to important prognostic variables such as Lauren's classification, lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The discrepant findings between the current study and the previous reports in terms of prognostic implications of TS could be explained as follows. First, the TS expression in primary tumours of gastric cancer patients may not reflect the ability of the tumour to induce TS protein or undergo TS gene amplification with exposure to chemotherapeutic agents (Johnston et al, 1994;Pestalozzi et al, 1997). Secondly, all patients in this study were treated with doxorubicin as well as 5-FU, while other studies demonstrating increased risk of recurrence and poor survival in gastric cancer patients with high TS expression used 5-FU or tegafur-uracil with or without mitomycin-C (Kuniyasu et al, 1998;Suda et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemical assessment of TS protein expression provides an obvious method to address this problem. Until now, studies using this technique have only assessed cytoplasmic expression of the enzyme (Johnston et al, 1994Suzuki et al, 1998;Yamachika et al, 1998;Paradiso et al, 2000). Despite the fact that nuclear staining has also been recorded (Johnston et al, 1991), we are unaware of any work into the clinicopathological significance of nuclear expression of TS in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is likely that thymidylate synthase is the main target for the nucleoside of 5-FU, which binds to the active site of the enzyme in a similar manner to dUMP. This is followed by incorporation of the folate co-factor (Pestalozzi et al, 1997), gastric cancer (Lenz et al, 1995) and primary rectal cancer (Johnston et al, 1994) all reach similar conclusions, with TS expression being measured either immunohistochemically, or using PCR to measure genetic expression of TS mRNA.…”
Section: Nucleoside Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…patients with high TS levels have a better outcome with that therapy. This has been seen both in 278 node-positive breast cancer patients receiving CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU) (Pestalozzi et al, 1997) and in 194 patients with Dukes' B and C rectal cancer receiving MOF (methyl CCNU, 5-FU vincristine) chemotherapy (Johnston et al, 1994). The reasons for the apparent paradox are not clear, but the data reported to date would certainly justify further translational studies to clarify the predictive role of TS expression; it remains quite possible that this will vary according to the type of tumour being treated.…”
Section: Nucleoside Analoguesmentioning
confidence: 99%