The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives

Abstract

BackgroundAcademic literature and international standards bodies suggest that user involvement, via the incorporation of human factors engineering methods within the medical device design and development (MDDD) process, offer many benefits that enable the development of safer and more usable medical devices that are better suited to users' needs. However, little research has been carried out to explore medical device manufacturers' beliefs and attitudes towards user involvement within this process, or indeed what value they believe can be added by doing so.MethodsIn-depth interviews with representatives from 11 medical device manufacturers are carried out. We ask them to specify who they believe the intended users of the device to be, who they consult to inform the MDDD process, what role they believe the user plays within this process, and what value (if any) they believe users add. Thematic analysis is used to analyse the fully transcribed interview data, to gain insight into medical device manufacturers' beliefs and attitudes towards user involvement within the MDDD process.ResultsA number of high-level themes emerged, relating who the user is perceived to be, the methods used, the perceived value and barriers to user involvement, and the nature of user contributions. The findings reveal that despite standards agencies and academic literature offering strong support for the employment formal methods, manufacturers are still hesitant due to a range of factors including: perceived barriers to obtaining ethical approval; the speed at which such activity may be carried out; the belief that there is no need given the 'all-knowing' nature of senior health care staff and clinical champions; a belief that effective results are achievable by consulting a minimal number of champions. Furthermore, less senior health care practitioners and patients were rarely seen as being able to provide valuable input into the process.ConclusionsMedical device manufacturers often do not see the benefit of employing formal human factors engineering methods within the MDDD process. Research is required to better understand the day-to-day requirements of manufacturers within this sector. The development of new or adapted methods may be required if user involvement is to be fully realised.

Bags, batteries and boxes: A qualitative interview study to understand how syringe drivers are adapted and used by healthcare staff

“…Thematic analysis has been successfully used to account for phenomena underpinning medical device design, development, purchasing and use (e.g. (Cafazzo et al, 2012;Money et al, 2011;Vincent et al, 2014)); we were expecting the analysis to provide a similar degree of insight in this case.…”

A patient perspective on eHealth in primary care

“…However, based on previous research, it is not expected that this significantly influenced the results. 35,36 In addition, by giving the participants the choice to fill out the questionnaire on paper or via the Internet, a broader study sample was covered.…”

“…Despite its potential, eHealth is not being adopted and implemented successfully in daily care routines. 36,37 The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport acknowledges the potential benefits of eHealth and the lack of implementation and actual use. In 2014, the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport, Edith Schippers, formulated three ambitions concerning eHealth which should be realized within five years.…”

How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices?

“…for smaller companies and those that are new to healthcare [9]. The design decisions that result from such testing require interpretation of the data, and so a lack of expertise or knowledge may prevent manufacturers from getting the most out of their usability studies [15].…”

“…Recent research has shown a similar link for medical devices [6] and so healthcare regulators are increasingly turning to usability testing [7][8][9][10]. Regulators in Europe and the USA now stipulate a formal approach to development known as human factors engineering (also known as usability engineering or user-centred design) [11], where usability is integrated into the entire development cycle rather than being assessed just prior to the release of the product.…”