The role of the teacher in the implementation of a School-based intervention on the physical activity practice of children

Gadais, Tegwen; Caron, Theo; Ayoub, Marie Belle; Karelis, Antony D.; Nadeau, Luc

doi:10.31236/osf.io/hbrjd

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(43 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The aims of ten articles was to assess the implementation of the intervention and additional influencing factors for implementation (51, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59-61, 64, 66). Five articles only assessed influencing factors for implementation (52,58,62,63,65), and one assessed the influencing factors for implementation, as well as the effectiveness of the intervention (55). The articles applied mixed methods (n=10), qualitative (n=5) and quantitative design (n=1).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The articles applied mixed methods (n=10), qualitative (n=5) and quantitative design (n=1). The interventions reported by the articles promoted PA (54,55,59,64,66), healthy nutrition (56,60,61), PA and healthy nutrition (51,52,58,62,63,65), and PA, healthy nutrition and reducing screen time (57) and PA, healthy nutrition, healthy sleep, and reduce screen time (53). In total, 14 independent interventions were reported, and three articles reported on the same intervention (58,62,63).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, 14 independent interventions were reported, and three articles reported on the same intervention (58,62,63). Five articles were considered reporting on simple interventions (55,59,61,64,66), eleven articles were considered reporting on complex interventions (51, 52, 54, 56-58, 60, 62, 63, 65) (see Additional file 3).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Influencing Factors for the Implementation of School-based Interventions Promoting Obesity Prevention Behaviors in Children with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review

Butscher¹,

Ellinger²,

Singer³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Health inequity (HI) remains a major challenge in public health. Improving the health of children with low socioeconomic status (SES) can help to reduce overall HI in children. Childhood obesity is a global problem, entailing several adverse health effects. It is crucial to assess influencing factors for adoption, implementation and sustainment of interventions. This review aims to identify articles reporting about influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low SES. It aims to critically appraise the articles’ quality, assess influencing factors, categorize and evaluate them, and to discuss possible implications. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in 7 databases with the following main inclusion criteria: 1) school-based interventions and 2) target group aged 5–14 years. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, its five domains (intervention characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, characteristics of individuals, process) along with 39 constructs within these domains were used to deductively analyze the data. We grouped the articles with regard to the characteristics of the interventions in simple and complex interventions. For each domain, and for the groups of simple and complex interventions, the most commonly reported influencing factors are identified. Results: 6452 articles were screened, and 16 met all eligibility criteria. Included articles applied mixed methods (n=10), qualitative (n=5) and quantitative design (n=1). Of these, five were considered to report simple interventions and eleven were considered to report complex interventions. In total, 295 influencing factors were assessed. Aspects of the inner setting were reported in every study, aspects of the outer setting were the least reported domain, and in the group of simple interventions not reported at all. In the inner setting, most reported influencing factors were time (n=7), scheduling (n=6) and communication (n=6). Conclusion: This review found a wide range of influencing factors for implementation. Most important influencing factors need to be assessed for every setting. Including all stakeholders involved in the implementation process enhances the prioritization of the most important influencing factors for the specific setting. More empirical research and practical guidance are needed to promote obesity prevention behaviors among children with low SES.

show abstract

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influencing Factors for the Implementation of School-based Interventions Promoting Obesity Prevention Behaviors in Children with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review

Butscher¹,

Ellinger²,

Singer³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The articles applied mixed methods (n = 10), qualitative (n = 5) and quantitative design (n = 1). The interventions reported by the articles promoted PA(54,55,59, 64, 66), healthy nutrition (56, 60, 61), PA and healthy nutrition(51,52, 58, 62, 63, 65), and PA, healthy nutrition and reducing screen time(57) and PA, healthy nutrition, healthy sleep, and reduce screen time(53). In total, 14 independent interventions were reported, and three articles reported on the same intervention (58, 62, 63).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, 14 independent interventions were reported, and three articles reported on the same intervention (58, 62, 63). Five articles were considered reporting on simple interventions(55,59, 61, 64, 66), eleven articles were considered reporting on complex interventions(51, 52, 54, 56-58, 60, 62, 63, 65) (see Additional le 3).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low socioeconomic status: A systematic review

Butscher¹,

Ellinger

Singer

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Health inequity (HI) remains a major challenge in public health. Improving the health of children with low socioeconomic status (SES) can help to reduce overall HI in children. Childhood obesity is a global problem, entailing several adverse health effects. It is crucial to assess the influencing factors for adoption, implementation and sustainment of interventions. This review aims to identify articles reporting about influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low SES. It aims to critically appraise the articles’ quality, assess influencing factors, categorize and evaluate them, and to discuss possible implications. Methods A systematic search was conducted in 7 databases with the following main inclusion criteria: 1) school-based interventions and 2) target group aged 5–14 years. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, its five domains (intervention characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, characteristics of individuals, process) along with 39 constructs within these domains were used to deductively analyze the data. We grouped the articles with regard to the characteristics of the interventions in simple and complex interventions. For each domain, and for the groups of simple and complex interventions, the most commonly reported influencing factors are identified. Results 6452 articles were screened, and 16 met all eligibility criteria. Included articles applied mixed methods (n = 10), qualitative (n = 5) and quantitative design (n = 1). Of these, five were considered to report simple interventions and eleven were considered to report complex interventions. In total, 295 influencing factors were assessed. Aspects of the inner setting were reported in every study, aspects of the outer setting were the least reported domain, and in the group of simple interventions not reported at all. In the inner setting, most reported influencing factors were time (n = 7), scheduling (n = 6) and communication (n = 6). Conclusion This review found a wide range of influencing factors for implementation. Most important influencing factors need to be assessed for every setting. Including all stakeholders involved in the implementation process enhances the prioritization of the most important influencing factors for the specific setting. More empirical research and practical guidance are needed to promote obesity prevention behaviors among children with low SES.

show abstract

The role of the teacher in the implementation of a School-based intervention on the physical activity practice of children

Cited by 2 publications

References 25 publications

Influencing Factors for the Implementation of School-based Interventions Promoting Obesity Prevention Behaviors in Children with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review

Influencing Factors for the Implementation of School-based Interventions Promoting Obesity Prevention Behaviors in Children with Low Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review

Influencing factors for the implementation of school-based interventions promoting obesity prevention behaviors in children with low socioeconomic status: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About