1939
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400011943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the spirochaete in the Wassermann reaction

Abstract: 1. The examination of 1100 sera by both the Wassermann reaction and the complement-fixation test with spirochaetes revealed a superior sensitivity of the latter reaction and practically equal specificity of the two tests.2. Syphilitic serum contains two different antibodies: one reacting with the lipoid antigen of the Wassermann reaction, the other with a specific antigen in the spirochaete.3. The spirochaetal antibody of syphilitic serum has a complex serological structure, corresponding to spirochaete strain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
1

Year Published

1940
1940
1957
1957

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, antibodies which give complement fixation in the presence of a specific antigen also cause the aggregation of that antigen (bacterial agglutination; protein precipitation). In this case also, as recently shown by Beck (34) and confirmed in this laboratory, syphilitic serum agglutinates the Reiter strain of cultured spirochetes (Table I, which gives as example the results in 9 sera out of approximately 100 tested). It is to be noted holic extracts of beef heart used in the Wassermann test continue to react with syphilitic serum.…”
Section: The Reactivity Of Syphilitic Serum With Cultured Sp#ochetessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, antibodies which give complement fixation in the presence of a specific antigen also cause the aggregation of that antigen (bacterial agglutination; protein precipitation). In this case also, as recently shown by Beck (34) and confirmed in this laboratory, syphilitic serum agglutinates the Reiter strain of cultured spirochetes (Table I, which gives as example the results in 9 sera out of approximately 100 tested). It is to be noted holic extracts of beef heart used in the Wassermann test continue to react with syphilitic serum.…”
Section: The Reactivity Of Syphilitic Serum With Cultured Sp#ochetessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…From time to time, various investigators have reported that syphilitic serum contains antibodies to spirochetes. Thus, syphilitic serum has been reported to agglutinate suspensions of cultured spirochetes in higher titres than do normal sera (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)34). Similarly, several investigators have reported that syphilitic human sera give complement fixation with suspensions or extracts of cultured spirochetes (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beck (1939) compared the reactivity of three cultivable strains (Reiter 36, Kazan II, and Kr6o) and a strain of mouth spirochaetes with syphilitic and normal sera, and showed that the Kazan and Reiter strains were the most sensitive, while the Reiter strain was the most specific, giving only 0 6 per cent. of reactions which were considered to be non-specific.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…carateum (pinta), cuniculi (rabbit), microdentium (normal oral cavity), genitale (from human genitalia), calligyrum (from smegma), and mucosum (which is reported as having pyogenic properties). This classification appears contradictory-at least to a certain extent-according to the results obtained by Gaehtgens (1929Gaehtgens ( , 1937, Beck (1939), Koch (1940, and Eagle and Hogan (1940) in absorption and complement-fixation tests. Thus it would seem improbable that antigens of the saprophytic Sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to about forty papers published between 1929 and 1949 in Germany and abroad, * Received for publication July 6, 1956. including Beck (1939) in England, Eagle and Hogan (1940) in the U.S. A., andMuster (1942) andLauber (1949) in Switzerland, the test was regarded as specific. The rate of biologic false positives was about 1 per cent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%