2014
DOI: 10.1177/0261927x14556817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Speaker’s Emotional State in Im/politeness Assessments

Abstract: Brown and Levinson proposed that three sociological variables—Distance, Power, and Ranking of the imposition—affect politeness assessments. Later scholarship, however, argued that these variables can be operationalized in several ways and are too abstract to capture the realities of im/polite discourse. We focus on one variable, Distance, whose operationalization has produced mixed results, and argue that introducing another variable (Relationship Affect) does not solve this problem, as further variables, such… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These all agree with the findings in Economidou-Kogetsidis' (2013) natural data and with the postulation that people feel the pressing need in real encounters to be more polite and thus less direct, with the underlying motivation for engaging in face-work (Rintell & Mitchell, 1989). What is more, the hearer of the requests in this study had a relatively higher status as the current or prospective teacher of the requesters and, as the related literature puts it, less direct strategies would be used more in low-high request situations (Blum-Kulka et al, 1989;Brown & Levinson, 1987), where people tend to deem conventional indirectness 'least impolite' (Culpeper, 2011;Vergis & Terkourafi, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These all agree with the findings in Economidou-Kogetsidis' (2013) natural data and with the postulation that people feel the pressing need in real encounters to be more polite and thus less direct, with the underlying motivation for engaging in face-work (Rintell & Mitchell, 1989). What is more, the hearer of the requests in this study had a relatively higher status as the current or prospective teacher of the requesters and, as the related literature puts it, less direct strategies would be used more in low-high request situations (Blum-Kulka et al, 1989;Brown & Levinson, 1987), where people tend to deem conventional indirectness 'least impolite' (Culpeper, 2011;Vergis & Terkourafi, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our study's evaluation of role-based relations is grounded on previous research on power and distance that used similar relationship designations (e.g., 'close friends', 'new colleague') to analyze the influence of the relation on politeness [18], [27]- [29]. Even though relationships change over time and during interaction [18], we assume that a basic evaluation is possible based solely on an agent's role forming the relationship designations.…”
Section: Research Expectations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each were formed by substituting the valence of the adjective in the corresponding root sentence. These sentence pairs were taken from a previous study (Vergis & Terkourafi, 2015), in which they were matched for offensiveness, emotional damage, and emotional state of the speaker. There were 12 positive adjectives (syllables: M = 2.83, standard deviation [sd] = 1.27; frequency: M = 9.24, sd = 1.69) and 12 negative adjectives (syllables: M = 2.50, sd = 0.90; frequency: M = 8.79, sd = 0.92), each used in two sentences.…”
Section: Stimulimentioning
confidence: 99%