2012
DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2012.691723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Soviet Past in Post-Soviet Memory Politics through Examples of Speeches from Estonian Presidents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kazakhstan is not an exception in using the memory of the terror victims in its nationbuilding process (Denison 2009(Denison , 1167Joesalu 2012Joesalu , 1007Malinova 2012, 388). Arguably, the commemorative practices are employed as a symbolic support to unite an ethnically diverse population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kazakhstan is not an exception in using the memory of the terror victims in its nationbuilding process (Denison 2009(Denison , 1167Joesalu 2012Joesalu , 1007Malinova 2012, 388). Arguably, the commemorative practices are employed as a symbolic support to unite an ethnically diverse population.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remembrance Day speeches as a specific type of commemorative activity According to Joesalu (2012), Peter Reichel in his study of the politics of memory in Germany has identified political celebrations and official anniversaries -among other mediums of memorial activity -that effectively use emotion to produce feelings of identity and integration (Joesalu 2012). We will analyze material mainly from speeches given by Kazakhstan's President Nursultan Nazarbayev from 2007 to 2015.…”
Section: Memorial Museums To Victims Of Stalin's Political Repressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the words of the current Lithuanian president, Dalia Grybauskaitė (2016), ‘five long decades were ripped away from the one hundred years of our journey by the Soviet occupation which left us with many unhealing wounds’. In turn, within this temporal order, the Soviet occupation becomes a ‘filter of meaning’, operationalised through the lenses of ‘rupture’ and ‘resistance’ as illustrated by Estonian presidential speeches on a national holiday, 24 February (see Jõesalu, 2012; Jõesalu and Kõresaar, 2013: 177; Figure 3). With the whole Soviet period being represented as equally alien, the intra-Soviet differences become trivial.…”
Section: Silences Within the Social Organisation Of National Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the memory policy level (history books, official statements and politicians' speeches), the Soviet era in post-Soviet Estonia is interpreted in the framework of the discourse of rupture (Kõresaar 2005;Jõesalu & Kõresaar forthcoming;Jõesalu 2012). Ene Kõresaar has used the notion 'prolonged rupture', in which the meaning of the Stalinist era is attributed to the entire Soviet period in Estonia (from 1940 to the end of the 1980s) (Kõresaar 2005: 151).…”
Section: On Discontinuitymentioning
confidence: 99%