Participatory Action Research 1991
DOI: 10.4135/9781412985383.n15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of the Social Scientist in Participatory Action Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, not all designers of technology accept that there are normative judgements embedded in their designs and thus every technological system or design solution is to a certain degree political (Kleine 2007). Designing technology is always a political act, in that it entails decisions on the technological space in which social action can take place. Ruano (1991), working from an agricultural outreach perspective, describes the role of the action researcher in the project as going through the phases of diagnosis (of the socio‐technical problem), technology generation and adaptation, technology testing, technology validation and finally technology transfer, with partners participating in each step.…”
Section: Action Research and Global Value Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all designers of technology accept that there are normative judgements embedded in their designs and thus every technological system or design solution is to a certain degree political (Kleine 2007). Designing technology is always a political act, in that it entails decisions on the technological space in which social action can take place. Ruano (1991), working from an agricultural outreach perspective, describes the role of the action researcher in the project as going through the phases of diagnosis (of the socio‐technical problem), technology generation and adaptation, technology testing, technology validation and finally technology transfer, with partners participating in each step.…”
Section: Action Research and Global Value Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants may believe they have been forced to contribute to reforms they disagree with. Often the divided par-ticipants have different and unequal status and power in the institution where the action research takes place, raising questions about whether the power relations are being exploited during the decision-making process (Ebest, 2001;Erickson, 1999;Meyer, 2000;Ruano, 1991;Van Den Berg, 2001;Zeni, Prophete, Cason, & Phillips, 2001).…”
Section: Conflict and Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%