2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the right hemisphere in semantic control: A case-series comparison of right and left hemisphere stroke

Abstract: Semantic control processes guide conceptual retrieval so that we are able to focus on non-dominant associations and features when these are required for the task or context, yet the neural basis of semantic control is not fully understood. Neuroimaging studies have emphasised the role of left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in controlled retrieval, while neuropsychological investigations of semantic control deficits have almost exclusively focussed on patients with left-sided damage (e.g., patients with semantic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
4
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By now a sizeable body of convergent patient, fMRI, and TMS evidence supports a role for bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal and temporoparietal cortex in shaping or regulating which aspects of meaning are retrieved in both verbal and non-verbal semantic tasks (Badre and Wagner, 2007;Noonan et al, 2009;Thompson-Schill et al, 1997;Thompson et al, 2016;Whitney et al, 2011a). Recent investigations have SOCIAL SEMANTICS 10 therefore begun to tease apart the individual contributions of these regions to semantic control and establish the extent to which they are distinct from domain-general executive processes (Davey et al, 2016;Devlin et al, 2003;Gough et al, 2005;Noonan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Social Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By now a sizeable body of convergent patient, fMRI, and TMS evidence supports a role for bilateral ventrolateral prefrontal and temporoparietal cortex in shaping or regulating which aspects of meaning are retrieved in both verbal and non-verbal semantic tasks (Badre and Wagner, 2007;Noonan et al, 2009;Thompson-Schill et al, 1997;Thompson et al, 2016;Whitney et al, 2011a). Recent investigations have SOCIAL SEMANTICS 10 therefore begun to tease apart the individual contributions of these regions to semantic control and establish the extent to which they are distinct from domain-general executive processes (Davey et al, 2016;Devlin et al, 2003;Gough et al, 2005;Noonan et al, 2013).…”
Section: Social Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third influence on future research is the potential for the CSC framework to pathology, while semantic control impairments arise following frontal and/or temporoparietal damage (Jefferies and Lambon Ralph, 2006;Thompson et al, 2016). It might also be interesting to consider whether future research might similarly dissociate social disorders on the basis of representation versus control impairments.…”
Section: How Can the Csc Framework Guide Future Social Cognition Resementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study of the role of the right hemisphere in semantic control, there was no significant difference found between RH-damaged patients and normal subjects when they performed a standard battery of semantic tasks including a synonym judgment task (Thompson, Henshall, & Jefferies, 2016). In a recent study of the role of the right hemisphere in semantic control, there was no significant difference found between RH-damaged patients and normal subjects when they performed a standard battery of semantic tasks including a synonym judgment task (Thompson, Henshall, & Jefferies, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Notably however, the activation pattern in RH stroke patients who are attempting to understand a proverb has not been identified, nor whether this differs from the normal population. In a recent study of the role of the right hemisphere in semantic control, there was no significant difference found between RH-damaged patients and normal subjects when they performed a standard battery of semantic tasks including a synonym judgment task (Thompson, Henshall, & Jefferies, 2016). This suggests that either the RH is not strongly associated with semantic tasks or that a compensatory mechanism exists in another part of the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…culdade relativamente à ! guração (Cardillo et al, 2016;Thompson et al, 2016;Schmidt e Seger, 2009;Bookheimer, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified