2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the pulp-froth interface on particle detachment and selectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pulp-froth interface is a region transitioning from the bubbly flow zone of the pulp, with low bubble density, to the froth, with high packing fraction for bubbles. Previous works, such as a recent review by Chipili and Bhondayi [50], have highlighted that coarser particles are more likely to detach at the interface [51] and the energy of the particle from the fluid imparted by the impeller is likely absorbed to be in the deformation of the bubble film or structural changes such as coalescence and topological rearrangements [52]. It is plausible that the hydrophobic particle repeatedly detached and reattached in this region, and once it had moved past the turbulent interface region, was entrained or even entrapped between bubbles as opposed to attached.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Profiles: Azimuthal Slicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pulp-froth interface is a region transitioning from the bubbly flow zone of the pulp, with low bubble density, to the froth, with high packing fraction for bubbles. Previous works, such as a recent review by Chipili and Bhondayi [50], have highlighted that coarser particles are more likely to detach at the interface [51] and the energy of the particle from the fluid imparted by the impeller is likely absorbed to be in the deformation of the bubble film or structural changes such as coalescence and topological rearrangements [52]. It is plausible that the hydrophobic particle repeatedly detached and reattached in this region, and once it had moved past the turbulent interface region, was entrained or even entrapped between bubbles as opposed to attached.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Profiles: Azimuthal Slicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation could be explained by the inertia of small particles, which is not enough to permit them to penetrate the film formed by the laminar fluid flow around the bubble and form a particle-bubble aggregate (Miettinen et al 2010). Less disruptive forces within the cell allow particles to attach to the bubble at lower impeller tip speeds since the film formed around the bubble is not as resistant to penetration by a moving particle (Chipili and Bhondayi 2021;Nguyen and Evans 2004). Furthermore, smaller particles that attach to a bubble are more likely to have a higher probability of reaching the surface than coarse particles (Zhang and Subasinghe 2016).…”
Section: Particle Size Distribution Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, the mechanism of bubble-particle collision detachment with varying hydrophobicity and sizes was investigated by analyzing particle trajectory and velocity, bubble velocity, and projected area by using MATLAB software. A thorough comprehension of the phase interface collision detachment mechanism is essential for enhancing the flotation process’s bubble-particle detachment mechanism and serving as a roadmap for increasing the maximum flotation particle size …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%