2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of the pineal gland in the photoperiodic control of bird song frequency and repertoire in the house sparrow, Passer domesticus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ALAN can also affect reproduction status in birds by interfering with the male copulatory vocalization that advances ovarian maturation and female nesting behavior (Brockway 1969;Hinde & Steel 1978). Indeed, photoperiodic information may regulate the activity of the high vocal center nucleus responsible for controlling vocal behavior in male birds, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 probably because of the involvement of the pineal gland (Wang et al 2014). Moreover, we found significant differences in disease severity scores for FM and KS between ALAN exposed birds and controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALAN can also affect reproduction status in birds by interfering with the male copulatory vocalization that advances ovarian maturation and female nesting behavior (Brockway 1969;Hinde & Steel 1978). Indeed, photoperiodic information may regulate the activity of the high vocal center nucleus responsible for controlling vocal behavior in male birds, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 probably because of the involvement of the pineal gland (Wang et al 2014). Moreover, we found significant differences in disease severity scores for FM and KS between ALAN exposed birds and controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There could, of course, be unmeasured variables that contribute to beak shape differences. Among the other factors known to cause beak shape differences, phylogenetic inertia (Shao et al 2016) is unlikely because it is a within-species comparison, and if divergent song preferences (Huber and Podos 2006;Badyaev et al 2008) would cause beak morphology to differ from the ecological optimum, we could expect sexual dimorphism because males are more frequently vocalizing and are the only sex expressing song motifs (Wang et al 2014). Because we do not find significant sexual dimorphism, selection on song is probably not strongly affecting the beak shape in these sparrow populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robertson et al, 2014). The pathways for this direct effect may well operate through melatonin (Wang et al, 2014). If so they are again "indirect" and we are still looking for a true direct impact of day length on neural machinery.…”
Section: Seasonality Within the Brain Itselfmentioning
confidence: 99%